H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 2-4

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 4–2 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2004 Japan Women's Open round of 16 6-3 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamarine Tanasugarn #76 6-3 7-6(2) Jill Craybas #59 Match data Oct 8, 2004* R16 Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tamarine Tanasugarn #85 6-2 7-5 Jill Craybas #58 Match data Sep 30, 2004* R32 Guangzhou Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tamarine Tanasugarn #58 6-1 7-5 Jill Craybas #66 Match data Jun 10, 2004* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Jill Craybas #82 6-4 4-6 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #27 Match data Oct 5, 2002* SF Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jill Craybas #102 2-6 6-4 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #19 Match data Jun 13, 2002* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Tamarine Tanasugarn #29 6-4 4-6 6-3 Jill Craybas #94 Match data Oct 5, 2001* R16 Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.