H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 2-4

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 4–2 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2004 Japan Open fourth round 6-3 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 8, 2004* Japan Open WTA 250 R16 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #76 6-3 7-6(2) Jill Craybas #59 Match data
Sep 30, 2004* Guangzhou WTA 250 R32 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #85 6-2 7-5 Jill Craybas #58 Match data
Jun 10, 2004* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #58 6-1 7-5 Jill Craybas #66 Match data
Oct 5, 2002* Japan Open WTA 250 SF Hard Jill Craybas #82 6-4 4-6 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #27 Match data
Jun 13, 2002* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Jill Craybas #102 2-6 6-4 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #19 Match data
Oct 5, 2001* Japan Open WTA 250 R16 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #29 6-4 4-6 6-3 Jill Craybas #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4