H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 1-4

Tatiana Panova holds a 4–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Panova leads 3–0 on clay, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2005 Istanbul third round 6-4 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 19, 2005* Istanbul WTA 500 R32 Clay Tatiana Panova #98 6-4 5-7 6-4 Jill Craybas #78 Match data
Feb 4, 2005* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Jill Craybas #75 6-4 4-6 7-5 Tatiana Panova #60 Match data
Apr 4, 2002* Sarasota WTA 250 R32 Clay Tatiana Panova #25 6-1 3-6 6-2 Jill Craybas #112 Match data
May 16, 2001* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Tatiana Panova #35 3-6 7-5 6-3 Jill Craybas #91 Match data
Mar 23, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Tatiana Panova #37 6-3 7-5 Jill Craybas #115 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —