H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 1-4

Tatiana Panova holds a 4–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Panova leads 3–0 on clay, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2005 Istanbul round of 32 6-4 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Panova #98 6-4 5-7 6-4 Jill Craybas #78 Match data May 19, 2005* R32 Istanbul Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Jill Craybas #75 6-4 4-6 7-5 Tatiana Panova #60 Match data Feb 4, 2005* R32 Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Tatiana Panova #25 6-1 3-6 6-2 Jill Craybas #112 Match data Apr 4, 2002* R32 Sarasota Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Tatiana Panova #35 3-6 7-5 6-3 Jill Craybas #91 Match data May 16, 2001* R64 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Tatiana Panova #37 6-3 7-5 Jill Craybas #115 Match data Mar 23, 2001* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Tatiana Panova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Tatiana Panova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/22 1.0 5.3 60.8% 51.6% 46.8% 48.3% 33.3% 49.8% 32.3%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% 2005 6/23 0.8 4.2 65.9% 55.3% 39.8% 45.9% 40.0% 50.4% 42.8%
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2006 3/4 0.3 10.0 53.2% 50.6% 34.2% 49.0% 47.2% 43.0% 35.7%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 12/326 0.8 5.9 61.4% 53.2% 40.2% 47.3% 40.1% 48.4% 38.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Tatiana Panova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1508 105.4 — — — — +37 — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.36
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1486 100.7 — — — — +8 — — 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.67
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1498 103.8 — — — — +10 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 — +0.45
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1475 115.4 — — — — +37 +88 — 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.03
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 1998 1472 113.4 — — — — +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.59
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1584 124.6 — — — — -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.99
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 2000 1677 127.2 — — — — +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.59
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 2001 1661 126.0 — — — — -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) — +2.56
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 2002 1753 142.0 — — — — -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.43
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.19 2003 1637 117.1 — — — — +61 -104 — 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.47
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.70 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 — +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.34
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.02 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.57
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.31 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.14
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.