H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-2

Jill Craybas and Virginia Ruano Pascual are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2005 Los Angeles second round 6-0 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 2005* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Jill Craybas #59 6-0 4-6 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #112 Match data
Oct 11, 2003* Tashkent WTA 250 QF Hard Virginia Ruano Pascual #71 6-2 6-1 Jill Craybas #95 Match data
Apr 10, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Jill Craybas #57 2-6 6-2 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #42 Match data
Jan 17, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Virginia Ruano Pascual #90 6-2 7-6(5) Jill Craybas #139 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —