H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jill Craybas vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-2

Jill Craybas and Virginia Ruano Pascual are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2005 Los Angeles round of 64 6-0 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Craybas #59 6-0 4-6 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #112 Match data Aug 10, 2005* R64 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Virginia Ruano Pascual #71 6-2 6-1 Jill Craybas #95 Match data Oct 11, 2003* QF Tashkent Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jill Craybas #57 2-6 6-2 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #42 Match data Apr 10, 2003* R32 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Virginia Ruano Pascual #90 6-2 7-6(5) Jill Craybas #139 Match data Jan 17, 2001* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Craybas Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0
23 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1
24 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2
25 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2
26 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2
27 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2
29 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3
31 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3
32 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3
34 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3
35 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3
37 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Craybas Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
34 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
36 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 212/350 of Jill Craybas's and 79/176 of Virginia Ruano Pascual's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jill Craybas Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5% 2003 3/36 0.3 2.3 72.9% 53.4% 41.5% 68.2% 37.0% 50.4% 38.7%
30 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6% 2004 8/28 1.3 3.4 70.2% 57.8% 52.2% 52.1% 47.3% 56.2% 48.0%
31 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2% 2005 3/28 0.3 4.0 62.4% 50.3% 35.5% 47.1% 46.7% 45.6% 48.7%
32 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8% 2006 16/28 0.6 1.5 71.4% 54.8% 47.0% 44.4% 44.7% 52.4% 43.4%
33 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8% 2007 20/25 0.7 2.3 70.3% 56.4% 42.0% 44.3% 49.5% 52.0% 41.7%
34 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6% 2008 19/21 0.4 1.9 71.2% 54.2% 42.7% 44.4% 41.5% 51.2% 43.7%
35 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2% 2009 8/8 0.5 2.0 71.2% 53.0% 46.4% 49.2% 50.5% 51.5% 41.2%
36 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8% 2010 2/2 0.0 3.5 72.4% 48.4% 22.6% 44.9% 66.7% 41.2% 33.3%
37 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2% — 79/436 0.6 2.2 70.7% 54.8% 43.9% 46.7% 46.3% 51.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Craybas Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02
21 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54
23 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26
24 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.47
25 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
26 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51
27 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34
28 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57
29 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46
30 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60
31 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27
32 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27
33 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.25
34 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 -0.37
35 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67
36 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00
37 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80 — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.