H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jill Hetherington vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 0-1
Bettina Fulco holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Hetherington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bettina Fulco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bettina Fulco won the 1989 Key Biscayne second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1989* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Bettina Fulco | 7-5 6-4 | Jill Hetherington | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Hetherington | #748 | #64 | 12 | 1,645 | 30 | 57 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Hetherington | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #386 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #81 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #122 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #247 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #277 | 1,456 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,436 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |