Jill Hetherington
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Kathy Jordan | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 13, 1990 | H2H |
| Helen Kelesi | 0 | 2 | 2 | Nov 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Nana Smith | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 23, 1989 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 22, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jill Hetherington vs Donna Faber H2H: 0-1
Donna Faber holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Hetherington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1988 Amelia Island round of 64 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 6-3 6-2 | Jill Hetherington | Match data | Apr 13, 1988* | R64 | Amelia Island | Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Hetherington | #748 | #64 | 12 | 1,645 | 31 | 58 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Hetherington | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #386 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #81 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #122 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #247 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #277 | 1,458 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jill Hetherington | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1984 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1987 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 24 | 42 | 66 | 36.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | 42 | 53 | 95 | 44.2% | 19 | 29 | 48 | 39.6% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jill Hetherington | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1496 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.17 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1532 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +14 | — | 40.6% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1675 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | +40 | -169 | -99 | 48.9% | +0.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.4 | +1.23 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1507 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.67 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.39 | 1990 | 1631 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -19 | -43 | 43.1% | -0.68 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.90 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1543 | 109.8 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.64 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.28 | 1991 | 1593 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +38 | +10 | 41.3% | -0.77 | 9–3 (75%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.2 | +1.62 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1523 | 106.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.21 | 1992 | 1542 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +37 | — | 38.0% | -0.77 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.6 | +0.56 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1537 | 105.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.25 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.01 | 1993 | 1432 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.12 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.5 | +0.77 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1534 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 33.3% | -0.17 | 2–0 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 1573 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | -38 | 46.9% | -0.23 | 5–8 (38%) | 4–4 (50%) | 98.9 | +1.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 1532 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | -43 | — | +52 | 36.8% | -0.89 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–3 (50%) | 97.3 | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 1482 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | -40 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.63 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 1476 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 1459 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.10 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 1438 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1645 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | -1 | +29 | -5 | 40.2% | -0.64 | 11–22 (33%) | 9–14 (39%) | 91.7 | +3.80 | — | 1719 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -11 | -44 | 41.2% | -0.60 | 26–20 (57%) | 13–17 (43%) | 103.5 | +3.33 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Donna Faber
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Angelica Gavaldon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |