H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jill Hetherington vs Halle Cioffi H2H: 0-1
Halle Cioffi holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Hetherington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Halle Cioffi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Halle Cioffi won the 1989 US Open second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Halle Cioffi | 6-2 6-4 | Jill Hetherington | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Hetherington | #748 | #64 | 12 | 1,645 | 30 | 57 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Halle Cioffi | #767 | #31 | 26 | 1,765 | 88 | 98 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Hetherington | Halle Cioffi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #386 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #95 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #81 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #122 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #247 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #277 | 1,456 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,436 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |