H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jill Hetherington vs Kate Brasher H2H: 0-1
Kate Brasher holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Hetherington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Brasher leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Brasher won the 1984 Rio de Janeiro third round 1-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 63
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1984* | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kate Brasher | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Jill Hetherington | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Hetherington | #748 | #64 | 12 | 1,645 | 30 | 57 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kate Brasher | — | — | — | 1,753 | 79 | 63 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jill Hetherington | Kate Brasher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #386 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1987 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #81 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #122 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #247 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #277 | 1,456 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,436 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |