H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jill Hetherington vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-2

Nana Smith holds a 2–0 lead over Jill Hetherington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nana Smith leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1989 Canadian Open round of 64 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jill Hetherington
CAN Age 61 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nana Smith #142 6-1 6-2 Jill Hetherington #101 Match data Aug 23, 1989* R64 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Nana Smith #148 6-2 6-1 Jill Hetherington #123 Match data Apr 20, 1989* R32 Pan Pacific Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Hetherington #748 #64 12 1,645 31 58 34.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jill Hetherington Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1984 2–2 50.0% #121 1,543 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1985 0–2 0.0% #118 1,522 0 0 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1986 1–1 50.0% #386 1,536 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1987 2–4 33.3% #169 1,534 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1988 15–19 44.1% #81 1,573 0 1 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1989 8–17 32.0% #122 1,532 0 1 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1990 1–6 14.3% #247 1,482 0 1 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1991 0–1 0.0% #245 1,475 0 1 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1992 1–3 25.0% #277 1,458 0 1 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 1993 0–2 0.0% #468 1,437 0 1 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jill Hetherington Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1984 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1986 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1988 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1989 6 14 20 30.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 24 42 66 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jill Hetherington Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1983 1507 98.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 — — +0.39 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1984 1543 109.8 — — — — +46 — — 54.5% +0.64 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.28 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1985 1523 106.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.21 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1986 1537 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.01 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1987 1534 111.8 — — — — — +29 — 33.3% -0.17 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.14 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1988 1573 119.5 — — — — +34 — -38 46.9% -0.23 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.9 +1.57 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1989 1532 113.9 — — — — -43 — +52 36.8% -0.89 2–5 (29%) 3–3 (50%) 97.3 +0.78 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1990 1482 97.6 — — — — -40 — — 25.0% -1.63 0–2 — — +0.39 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1991 1476 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 1992 1459 96.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.64 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 1993 1438 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — 0.00 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1645 115.3 — — — — -1 +29 -5 40.2% -0.64 11–22 (33%) 9–14 (39%) 91.7 +3.80 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.