H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jill Schwikert vs Janet Haas H2H: 0-2 (incl. walkovers)

Jill Schwikert vs Janet Haas: 0–1 excluding walkovers; 0–2 including 1 walkover. Across 2 main-draw results including walkovers, Janet Haas leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janet Haas won the 1975 Orlando round of 64 W/O.

H2H including walkovers
0 2
2 main-draw results

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Janet Haas (w/o) Jill Schwikert Match data Oct 15, 1975* R64 Orlando WTA 250 Clay
Janet Haas 6-2 6-2 Jill Schwikert Match data Feb 15, 1974* R16 Providence WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jill Schwikert 1,512 10 31 24.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Janet Haas 1,622 30 43 41.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Jill Schwikert Janet Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1970 0–1 0.0% 1,490 0 0 1972 6–7 46.2% 1,516 0 0
1972 0–1 0.0% 1,476 0 0 1973 9–13 40.9% 1,567 0 0
1973 2–12 14.3% 1,471 0 0 1974 9–15 37.5% 1,524 0 0
1974 7–12 36.8% 1,453 0 0 1975 4–7 36.4% 1,487 0 0
1975 1–5 16.7% 1,432 0 0 1980 2–1 66.7% 1,505 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Jill Schwikert Janet Haas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1970 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1972 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0%
1973 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
1974 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 2 1 3 66.7%
Career 3 9 12 25.0% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% Career 0 2 2 0.0% 22 27 49 44.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Jill Schwikert Janet Haas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1970 1490 98.9 0.0% -3.00 -0.06 1972 1516 107.8 +19 +19 42.3% -0.61 1–1 0–1 +1.01
1972 1477 87.4 0.0% -6.00 +0.14 1973 1568 116.9 +4 -23 43.5% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 2–0 +1.09
1973 1471 108.4 +29 +16 13.8% -3.31 1–0 -1.00 1974 1524 110.3 +16 +3 +20 40.0% -0.76 2–2 (50%) +2.00
1974 1453 105.6 +52 +3 +70 40.9% -0.52 2–4 (33%) 1–0 +2.11 1975 1487 101.2 +24 30.4% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.5 +0.84
1975 1433 100.0 18.2% -1.82 1–0 +0.42 1980 1506 104.8 +17 66.7% +1.50 +0.38
Career 1513 103.5 +39 +10 +70 27.3% -1.78 4–4 (50%) 1–0 +4.03 Career 1622 112.6 +16 +10 +7 41.1% -0.74 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 103.4 +7.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.