H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jing-Qian Yi vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-0
Jing-Qian Yi holds a 1–0 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jing-Qian Yi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jing-Qian Yi won the 1996 Indian Wells second round 0-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 52
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1996* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jing-Qian Yi | 0-6 6-1 6-4 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jing-Qian Yi | #339 | #69 | 460 | 1,608 | 19 | 28 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jing-Qian Yi | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #191 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2000 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |