H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jo Anne Faull vs Tammy Whittington H2H: 0-1

Tammy Whittington holds a 1–0 lead over Jo Anne Faull in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tammy Whittington leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tammy Whittington won the 1992 Birmingham round of 64 6-2 6-4.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 60 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tammy Whittington #130 6-2 6-4 Jo Anne Faull Match data Jun 10, 1992* R64 Birmingham Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jo Anne Faull 1,726 31 58 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tammy Whittington #559 #105 11 1,518 5 11 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Anne Faull Tammy Whittington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 3–5 37.5% 1,520 0 0
18 1989 18–18 50.0% 1,673 0 0
19 1990 4–16 20.0% 1,539 0 0
20 1991 2–7 22.2% 1,485 0 0
21 1992 3–7 30.0% 1,473 0 0
22 1993 1–5 16.7% 1,445 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #273 1,484 0 0
24 1990 0–1 0.0% #302 1,470 0 0
25 1991 2–2 50.0% #162 1,490 0 0
26 1992 3–5 37.5% #187 1,469 0 0
27 1993 0–2 0.0% #384 1,447 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jo Anne Faull Tammy Whittington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1521 117.8 +12 +79 42.1% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.9 +0.23
18 1989 1674 124.9 -154 +20 -45 50.7% +0.15 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 -0.01
19 1990 1539 97.4 -43 +13 +109 23.8% -1.98 0–4 (0%) +0.31
20 1991 1486 99.4 -40 +149 28.6% -1.95 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 +0.81
21 1992 1473 105.2 +5 37.5% -1.33 1–5 (17%) 1–1 +0.39
22 1993 1445 95.6 +1 26.7% -2.07 1–2 (33%) +0.23 1988 1484 97.5 0.0% -3.00 +0.17
24 1990 1471 97.9 33.3% -2.00 0–1 +0.10
25 1991 1490 96.5 +68 44.4% -1.22 1–0 1–0 +0.46
26 1992 1469 93.6 +72 36.8% -1.26 2–1 (67%) +1.37
27 1993 1447 94.3 20.0% -2.60 0–1 -0.02
Career 1727 113.1 -65 +18 +63 38.3% -0.95 9–17 (35%) 8–7 (53%) 97.4 +2.23 1519 92.2 +68 +72 34.2% -1.58 3–3 (50%) 1–0 +13.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.