H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 2-0

Jo Durie holds a 2–0 lead over Bettina Fulco in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jo Durie leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1991 US Open round of 64 6-4 6-0.

GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
ARG Age 58 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo Durie #121 6-4 6-0 Bettina Fulco #100 Match data Aug 29, 1991* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Jo Durie #29 6-3 6-4 Bettina Fulco #112 Match data Feb 18, 1987* R64 Boca Raton WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jo Durie — #5 31 2,102 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Bettina Fulco — #23 197 1,873 139 153 47.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Bettina Fulco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% #248 1,482 0 0
17 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,618 0 1 1986 10–7 58.8% #116 1,565 0 0
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1987 24–17 58.5% #40 1,735 0 0
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,736 0 4 1988 34–21 61.8% #24 1,776 0 0
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1989 19–15 55.9% #47 1,740 0 0
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,842 0 7 1990 9–21 30.0% #131 1,567 0 0
22 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,095 0 9 1991 12–15 44.4% #76 1,621 0 0
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,891 0 9 1992 12–17 41.4% #83 1,622 0 0
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9 1993 4–13 23.5% — 1,561 0 0
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 1994 5–9 35.7% #88 1,546 0 0
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,742 0 9 1995 6–9 40.0% #142 1,577 0 0
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,703 0 9 1996 4–6 40.0% #133 1,575 0 0
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1997 0–2 0.0% #247 1,550 0 0
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jo Durie Bettina Fulco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1988 6 8 14 42.9% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — — — — —
21 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1990 6 10 16 37.5% 3 11 14 21.4% — — — — — — — —
22 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1992 3 5 8 37.5% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
27 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5% — 26 45 71 36.6% 110 101 211 52.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jo Durie Bettina Fulco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +95 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 1602 121.7 — — — — — -35 +42 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.17 1985 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03
17 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +14 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +3.05 1986 1565 108.7 — — — — +12 +42 — 54.1% +0.59 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +2.34
18 1979 1713 129.5 — — — — — -74 -93 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.65 1987 1735 150.5 — — — — -167 +63 -112 55.7% +0.74 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 103.6 -1.76
19 1980 1736 123.2 — — — — -179 -11 -58 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.27 1988 1776 144.7 — — — — -218 +178 — 58.5% +0.73 7–5 (58%) 0–6 (0%) 96.3 -0.75
20 1981 1861 136.4 — — — — -158 -78 -117 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -1.05 1989 1741 135.4 — — — — -191 +140 — 51.9% +0.01 8–3 (73%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.31
21 1982 1843 141.3 — — — — -59 -76 -39 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -1.90 1990 1567 119.5 — — — — -3 +86 — 33.3% -1.33 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) 99.4 -1.41
22 1983 2096 160.0 — — — — -76 -185 -100 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.50 1991 1622 127.2 — — — — -67 +48 — 47.5% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -0.89
23 1984 1892 136.4 — — — — +10 -61 +83 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.35 1992 1622 118.8 — — — — -72 +70 — 40.0% -0.95 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 103.6 -0.19
24 1985 1801 133.4 — — — — +15 -49 +121 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.39 1993 1562 112.3 — — — — -38 +40 — 28.9% -1.66 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.60
25 1986 1843 140.1 — — — — +2 -80 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -2.77 1994 1547 118.6 — — — — — +70 — 37.5% -0.87 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.82
26 1987 1742 134.3 — — — — +30 -31 +107 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.4 -2.49 1995 1578 113.5 — — — — -72 +46 — 41.9% -0.97 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.59
27 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — 0 -16 +121 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.25 1996 1575 112.7 — — — — — +11 — 40.9% -0.41 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.26
28 1989 1622 126.1 — — — — -7 — +202 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.33 1997 1550 97.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.05
29 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +5 -111 +95 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1689 130.8 — — — — -48 -50 +163 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1564 107.8 — — — — -12 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1549 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2102 141.8 — — — — -26 -68 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.49 — 1874 135.9 — — — — -90 +91 -112 46.9% -0.23 41–30 (58%) 16–26 (38%) 98.3 -1.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.