H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jo Durie vs Deborah Jevans H2H: 3-2
Jo Durie holds a 3–2 lead over Deborah Jevans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Deborah Jevans leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1981 Hampstead final 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1981* | Hampstead | WTA 250 | F | — | Jo Durie | 6-3 6-4 | Deborah Jevans | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1980* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Deborah Jevans | 6-3 0-6 7-5 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1979* | Hampstead | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Jo Durie | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Deborah Jevans | Match data |
| May 28, 1977* | Glasgow | WTA 250 | QF | — | Jo Durie | 6-2 6-3 | Deborah Jevans | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1976* | Southport | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Deborah Jevans | 6-7 7-5 13-11 | Jo Durie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | #302 | #5 | 31 | 2,099 | 314 | 264 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Deborah Jevans | — | — | — | 1,699 | 58 | 66 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo Durie | Deborah Jevans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 12–9 | 57.1% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,842 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,717 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,693 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,562 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,554 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,547 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |