H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Grace Kim H2H: 1-1

Jo Durie and Grace Kim are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on carpet, while Grace Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grace Kim won the 1985 Marco Island round of 64 2-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie

GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H

1 – 1

2 main-draw meetings

Grace Kim

USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Grace Kim	2-6 7-5 6-3	Jo Durie #26	Match data	Jan 30, 1985*	R64	Marco Island	WTA 250	Hard
Jo Durie #5	6-2 5-7 6-0	Grace Kim	Match data	Feb 23, 1984*	R32	East Hanover	WTA 250	Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Jo Durie	#302	#5	31	2,101	311	263	54.2%	0	0	0	1	8	9
Grace Kim	—	—	—	1,705	47	82	36.4%	0	0	0	0	1	1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Jo Durie							Grace Kim
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
14	1975	1–1	50.0%	—	1,498	0	0	1982	7–3	70.0%	—	1,585	0	1
15	1976	5–6	45.5%	—	1,503	0	0	1983	2–4	33.3%	—	1,591	0	1
16	1977	11–7	61.1%	—	1,602	0	0	1984	6–10	37.5%	—	1,622	0	1
17	1978	15–9	62.5%	—	1,619	0	1	1985	17–25	40.5%	—	1,694	0	1
18	1979	15–8	65.2%	—	1,713	0	3	1986	10–22	31.2%	—	1,605	0	1
19	1980	21–14	60.0%	—	1,733	0	4	1987	5–13	27.8%	—	1,515	0	1
20	1981	30–14	68.2%	—	1,859	0	7	1988	0–5	0.0%	—	1,469	0	1
21	1982	25–20	55.6%	—	1,841	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1983	47–18	72.3%	#6	2,094	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1984	16–15	51.6%	#24	1,890	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1985	17–19	47.2%	#26	1,800	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1986	24–17	58.5%	#24	1,841	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1987	10–17	37.0%	#73	1,741	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1988	19–19	50.0%	#60	1,702	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1989	8–13	38.1%	#117	1,621	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1990	13–13	50.0%	#64	1,673	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1991	15–18	45.5%	#62	1,708	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1992	13–16	44.8%	#59	1,688	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1993	4–12	25.0%	#192	1,563	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1994	1–4	20.0%	#348	1,555	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1995	1–3	25.0%	#292	1,548	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Jo Durie																	Grace Kim
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
14	1975	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1982	6	1	7	85.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1976	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	3	4	7	42.9%	1983	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
16	1977	—	—	—	—	5	4	9	55.6%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	1984	4	4	8	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%
17	1978	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	1985	11	12	23	47.8%	3	7	10	30.0%	0	4	4	0.0%	3	2	5	60.0%
18	1979	—	—	—	—	6	2	8	75.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1986	4	6	10	40.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	5	11	16	31.3%
19	1980	—	—	—	—	13	6	19	68.4%	8	4	12	66.7%	0	4	4	0.0%	1987	1	7	8	12.5%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	3	2	5	60.0%
20	1981	4	2	6	66.7%	7	4	11	63.6%	6	5	11	54.5%	3	3	6	50.0%	1988	0	2	2	0.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1982	4	3	7	57.1%	5	3	8	62.5%	10	6	16	62.5%	6	8	14	42.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1983	12	3	15	80.0%	9	3	12	75.0%	16	4	20	80.0%	10	8	18	55.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1984	2	4	6	33.3%	2	4	6	33.3%	8	4	12	66.7%	4	3	7	57.1%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1985	4	7	11	36.4%	1	3	4	25.0%	9	6	15	60.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1986	10	6	16	62.5%	3	2	5	60.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	7	6	13	53.8%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1987	3	5	8	37.5%	1	2	3	33.3%	5	5	10	50.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1988	9	9	18	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	7	5	12	58.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1989	6	9	15	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1990	6	6	12	50.0%	—	—	—	—	7	4	11	63.6%	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1991	7	9	16	43.8%	0	3	3	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1992	3	7	10	30.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	6	3	9	66.7%	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1993	2	4	6	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1994	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1995	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	73	75	148	49.3%	57	45	102	55.9%	103	72	175	58.9%	50	65	115	43.5%	—	28	35	63	44.4%	4	18	22	18.2%	3	10	13	23.1%	11	18	29	37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Jo Durie																Grace Kim
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
14	1975	1499	100.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	+0.20	1–0	0–1	—	+0.55	1982	1586	114.0	—	—	—	—	+73	—	—	66.7%	+1.10	3–0 (100%)	1–2 (33%)	103.8	+1.42
15	1976	1503	107.8	—	—	—	—	+73	—	+94	54.2%	+0.71	1–3 (25%)	1–0	—	+3.14	1983	1592	115.9	—	—	—	—	+65	—	—	30.8%	-1.00	1–0	—	—	-0.06
16	1977	1602	121.5	—	—	—	—	—	-35	+40	56.1%	+0.71	4–1 (80%)	0–1	—	+2.47	1984	1622	113.8	—	—	—	—	+26	—	+18	36.6%	-1.49	6–3 (67%)	1–2 (33%)	103.7	-0.48
17	1978	1619	121.0	—	—	—	—	+18	—	-9	57.4%	+0.50	5–1 (83%)	1–2 (33%)	104.3	+2.99	1985	1694	125.2	—	—	—	—	+52	-205	-135	43.4%	-0.79	6–9 (40%)	6–2 (75%)	101.5	-0.64
18	1979	1714	129.5	—	—	—	—	—	-76	-94	58.5%	+0.36	6–1 (86%)	6–2 (75%)	110.0	+0.87	1986	1605	117.7	—	—	—	—	+47	-126	—	33.3%	-1.54	2–3 (40%)	2–2 (50%)	99.0	+0.32
19	1980	1734	122.7	—	—	—	—	-184	-10	-56	61.7%	+0.60	5–8 (38%)	4–1 (80%)	99.6	+0.68	1987	1515	97.7	—	—	—	—	+45	—	-17	32.6%	-1.47	3–4 (43%)	1–1	—	+2.17
20	1981	1859	136.3	—	—	—	—	-159	-77	-116	60.8%	+0.60	12–2 (86%)	4–1 (80%)	113.5	-0.98	1988	1469	96.4	—	—	—	—	—	-61	—	0.0%	-3.90	—	0–1	—	-0.26
21	1982	1841	141.1	—	—	—	—	-59	-75	-37	55.1%	+0.21	8–9 (47%)	2–4 (33%)	97.4	-2.62	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1983	2095	159.8	—	—	—	—	-75	-184	-99	69.3%	+1.31	7–5 (58%)	3–2 (60%)	104.6	-5.64	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1984	1891	136.3	—	—	—	—	+11	-59	+84	49.3%	+0.53	7–4 (64%)	1–5 (17%)	95.2	+0.18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1985	1800	133.3	—	—	—	—	+15	-48	+123	48.8%	+0.06	7–7 (50%)	1–4 (20%)	96.7	-1.37	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1986	1842	140.0	—	—	—	—	+2	-79	+45	55.7%	+0.21	11–6 (65%)	8–3 (73%)	105.1	-3.56	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1987	1741	134.1	—	—	—	—	+30	-30	+108	41.0%	-0.69	2–5 (29%)	2–2 (50%)	96.3	-2.72	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1988	1703	127.8	—	—	—	—	-1	-16	+119	49.4%	-0.10	6–5 (55%)	8–4 (67%)	101.9	-0.26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1989	1622	126.0	—	—	—	—	-8	—	+201	41.3%	-0.67	1–3 (25%)	3–2 (60%)	98.1	+0.38	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1990	1674	130.7	—	—	—	—	-60	—	+193	51.7%	+0.48	2–6 (25%)	3–5 (38%)	93.4	+0.04	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1991	1709	132.3	—	—	—	—	+4	-111	+94	45.5%	-0.12	6–7 (46%)	1–2 (33%)	100.5	+1.02	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1992	1689	130.7	—	—	—	—	-48	-50	+162	50.0%	-0.09	3–7 (30%)	4–1 (80%)	99.1	+0.39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1993	1563	107.8	—	—	—	—	-11	—	—	35.9%	-0.74	3–6 (33%)	0–4 (0%)	92.1	+1.33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1994	1555	106.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	+191	33.3%	-1.42	0–2	—	—	-0.60	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1995	1548	107.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	+141	40.0%	-0.60	0–2	1–0	—	-0.20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2101	141.6	—	—	—	—	-26	-67	+43	53.6%	+0.27	97–90 (52%)	53–46 (54%)	102.6	-0.68	—	1705	119.1	—	—	—	—	+49	-161	-47	38.2%	-1.14	21–19 (53%)	11–10 (52%)	103.5	+1.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Jo Durie's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Helena Sukova	3	10	13	Aug 14, 1992	H2H
Rosalyn Fairbank	8	5	13	Jul 21, 1990	H2H
Martina Navratilova	0	12	12	Feb 2, 1991	H2H
Pam Shriver	2	9	11	Aug 1, 1991	H2H
Anne Hobbs	4	5	9	May 28, 1986	H2H

Grace Kim's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Alycia Moulton	2	2	4	Aug 5, 1987	H2H
Gabriela Sabatini	1	3	4	Oct 16, 1986	H2H
Wendy Turnbull	0	4	4	Jan 15, 1986	H2H
Bonnie Gadusek	0	3	3	Oct 11, 1985	H2H
Shawn Foltz	1	2	3	Jul 25, 1985	H2H