H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 1-0

Jo Durie holds a 1–0 lead over Helen Kelesi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1991 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Helen Kelesi
CAN Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo Durie #82 6-3 6-2 Helen Kelesi #23 Match data Jun 26, 1991* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,101 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Helen Kelesi #755 #13 54 1,954 213 165 56.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Helen Kelesi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 1985 15–15 50.0% #48 1,642 0 0
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0 1986 28–21 57.1% #39 1,745 0 1
17 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,619 0 1 1987 22–19 53.7% #32 1,785 0 1
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1988 33–19 63.5% #19 1,814 0 2
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,733 0 4 1989 36–18 66.7% #13 1,872 0 2
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,859 0 7 1990 23–17 57.5% #25 1,784 0 2
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1991 26–20 56.5% #29 1,715 0 2
22 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,094 0 9 1992 7–13 35.0% #128 1,632 0 2
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,890 0 9 1993 18–13 58.1% #48 1,756 0 2
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9 1994 5–10 33.3% #125 1,647 0 2
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,841 0 9 — — — — — — —
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,702 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jo Durie Helen Kelesi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1986 11 7 18 61.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
17 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 11 10 21 52.4% 20 5 25 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1989 20 9 29 69.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 7 8 15 46.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1991 8 8 16 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1992 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5% — 98 77 175 56.0% 88 50 138 63.8% 9 15 24 37.5% 18 23 41 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jo Durie Helen Kelesi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +94 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.14 1985 1642 120.5 — — — — +6 -36 — 48.0% -0.51 9–6 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 106.9 +0.84
16 1977 1602 121.5 — — — — — -35 +40 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.47 1986 1745 135.4 — — — — -29 -31 -160 54.6% +0.16 12–9 (57%) 10–8 (56%) 106.9 +0.08
17 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +18 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +2.99 1987 1785 144.2 — — — — -39 +12 -185 53.5% +0.11 8–9 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 100.3 -2.78
18 1979 1714 129.5 — — — — — -76 -94 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.87 1988 1815 148.0 — — — — -89 +155 — 62.1% +0.90 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 96.5 -0.81
19 1980 1734 122.7 — — — — -184 -10 -56 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.68 1989 1872 151.1 — — — — -33 +146 — 64.5% +0.83 11–6 (65%) 6–4 (60%) 105.2 -2.05
20 1981 1859 136.3 — — — — -159 -77 -116 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -0.98 1990 1785 139.7 — — — — -66 +217 — 60.0% +0.68 4–8 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 93.8 +0.69
21 1982 1841 141.1 — — — — -59 -75 -37 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -2.62 1991 1715 141.4 — — — — -34 +257 -139 54.7% +0.47 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 98.7 +0.82
22 1983 2095 159.8 — — — — -75 -184 -99 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.64 1992 1633 124.6 — — — — -3 — — 46.3% -0.12 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.8 -0.03
23 1984 1891 136.3 — — — — +11 -59 +84 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.18 1993 1756 136.5 — — — — -3 +91 -126 57.6% +0.51 6–2 (75%) 6–4 (60%) 107.2 -1.21
24 1985 1800 133.3 — — — — +15 -48 +123 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.37 1994 1647 125.5 — — — — +73 +113 — 38.7% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.09
25 1986 1842 140.0 — — — — +2 -79 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -3.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 1741 134.1 — — — — +30 -30 +108 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -2.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — -1 -16 +119 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1622 126.0 — — — — -8 — +201 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +4 -111 +94 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1689 130.7 — — — — -48 -50 +162 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1563 107.8 — — — — -11 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1548 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2101 141.6 — — — — -26 -67 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.68 — 1955 146.3 — — — — -28 +126 -159 56.1% +0.37 67–61 (52%) 46–39 (54%) 104.4 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.