H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jo Durie vs Hu Na H2H: 1-1
Jo Durie and Hu Na are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1990 Singapore third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 65
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1990* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Hu Na | 6-2 6-3 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jo Durie | 6-1 1-6 6-4 | Hu Na | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo Durie | Hu Na | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1978 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,842 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,717 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,693 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,562 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,554 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,547 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |