H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Katja Ebbinghaus H2H: 1-0

Jo Durie holds a 1–0 lead over Katja Ebbinghaus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1978 Bremen quarterfinal 6-2 6-7 7-5.

GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo Durie 6-2 6-7 7-5 Katja Ebbinghaus Match data Feb 5, 1978* QF Bremen WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jo Durie — #5 31 2,102 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Katja Ebbinghaus — — — 1,878 179 146 55.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Katja Ebbinghaus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,736 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1968 4–6 40.0% — 1,493 0 0
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,842 0 7 1969 10–9 52.6% — 1,559 0 0
22 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,095 0 9 1970 4–5 44.4% — 1,577 0 0
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,891 0 9 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,592 0 0
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9 1972 24–12 66.7% — 1,832 0 2
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 1973 16–14 53.3% — 1,814 0 2
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,742 0 9 1974 19–17 52.8% — 1,779 0 3
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,703 0 9 1975 19–14 57.6% — 1,838 0 3
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1976 10–9 52.6% — 1,765 0 3
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9 1977 26–14 65.0% — 1,820 0 5
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9 1978 6–16 27.3% — 1,690 0 5
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9 1979 3–4 42.9% — 1,653 0 5
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,710 0 6
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9 1981 3–5 37.5% — 1,672 0 7
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9 1982 3–1 75.0% — 1,679 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jo Durie Katja Ebbinghaus
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1968 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1969 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
22 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1970 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1971 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1972 2 1 3 66.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1974 0 3 3 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 0 3 100.0%
30 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1980 — — — — 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1981 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
34 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1982 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5% — 4 11 15 26.7% 132 88 220 60.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 15 17 32 46.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jo Durie Katja Ebbinghaus
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +95 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 1602 121.7 — — — — — -35 +42 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +14 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +3.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 1713 129.5 — — — — — -74 -93 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1736 123.2 — — — — -179 -11 -58 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 1861 136.4 — — — — -158 -78 -117 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -1.05 1968 1494 106.8 — — — — — -1 — 47.8% -0.30 0–3 (0%) — — -0.04
21 1982 1843 141.3 — — — — -59 -76 -39 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -1.90 1969 1559 120.0 — — — — +58 -14 — 53.5% +0.37 2–3 (40%) — — +0.60
22 1983 2096 160.0 — — — — -76 -185 -100 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.50 1970 1577 112.4 — — — — — +12 — 42.9% -0.48 2–1 (67%) — — +0.41
23 1984 1892 136.4 — — — — +10 -61 +83 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.35 1971 1593 120.8 — — — — — -4 -15 54.3% +0.37 1–7 (13%) — — +1.77
24 1985 1801 133.4 — — — — +15 -49 +121 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.39 1972 1832 145.6 — — — — -229 +82 -272 65.5% +0.91 5–7 (42%) 0–2 — -2.08
25 1986 1843 140.1 — — — — +2 -80 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -2.77 1973 1815 136.7 — — — — -146 +69 — 54.9% +0.10 4–7 (36%) 2–0 — -2.45
26 1987 1742 134.3 — — — — +30 -31 +107 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.4 -2.49 1974 1780 126.8 — — — — -223 +72 -178 56.0% +0.31 3–4 (43%) 6–3 (67%) 99.3 -0.92
27 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — 0 -16 +121 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.25 1975 1839 139.4 — — — — — +59 — 56.0% +0.24 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 103.7 -1.56
28 1989 1622 126.1 — — — — -7 — +202 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.33 1976 1765 129.1 — — — — — +93 -151 51.2% +0.30 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.11
29 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04 1977 1820 138.1 — — — — -237 +105 -211 60.2% +0.77 9–4 (69%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 +0.73
30 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +5 -111 +95 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02 1978 1691 126.6 — — — — -134 +162 -113 33.3% -1.17 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.8 -1.89
31 1992 1689 130.8 — — — — -48 -50 +163 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39 1979 1653 108.5 — — — — -65 — — 43.8% -0.63 1–1 1–0 — +1.21
32 1993 1564 107.8 — — — — -12 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33 1980 1710 128.6 — — — — — +78 — 62.3% +1.20 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +1.31
33 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60 1981 1672 108.9 — — — — — +133 — 53.8% +0.69 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +1.11
34 1995 1549 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20 1982 1680 106.2 — — — — — +115 — 75.0% +1.50 — — — +0.60
Career — 2102 141.8 — — — — -26 -68 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.49 — 1879 138.4 — — — — -150 +67 -146 55.2% +0.35 47–53 (47%) 20–20 (50%) 97.1 -0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.