H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Jo Durie vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-2

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 2–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1993 Eastbourne third round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Kimiko Date Krumm (w/o) Jo Durie #96 Match data
Aug 17, 1991* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-1 Jo Durie #160 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8