H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-1

Jo Durie and Lori Mcneil are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1988 Birmingham round of 16 4-6 6-2 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #10 4-6 6-2 8-6 Jo Durie #74 Match data Jun 10, 1988* R16 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Jo Durie #26 6-7 6-2 7-6 Lori Mcneil #95 Match data Jan 6, 1986 R32 Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,101 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,619 0 1 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,733 0 4 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,859 0 7 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,094 0 9 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,890 0 9 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,841 0 9 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,702 0 9 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jo Durie Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jo Durie Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +94 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 1602 121.5 — — — — — -35 +40 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.47 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +18 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +2.99 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1979 1714 129.5 — — — — — -76 -94 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.87 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1980 1734 122.7 — — — — -184 -10 -56 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.68 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1981 1859 136.3 — — — — -159 -77 -116 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -0.98 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27
21 1982 1841 141.1 — — — — -59 -75 -37 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -2.62 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20
22 1983 2095 159.8 — — — — -75 -184 -99 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.64 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49
23 1984 1891 136.3 — — — — +11 -59 +84 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.18 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78
24 1985 1800 133.3 — — — — +15 -48 +123 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.37 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06
25 1986 1842 140.0 — — — — +2 -79 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -3.56 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23
26 1987 1741 134.1 — — — — +30 -30 +108 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -2.72 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — -1 -16 +119 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.26 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 1989 1622 126.0 — — — — -8 — +201 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.38 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +4 -111 +94 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 1992 1689 130.7 — — — — -48 -50 +162 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 1993 1563 107.8 — — — — -11 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 1995 1548 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 2101 141.6 — — — — -26 -67 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.68 — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.