H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jo Durie vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-1

Jo Durie and Lori Mcneil are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1988 Birmingham fourth round 4-6 6-2 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 10, 1988* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Lori Mcneil #10 4-6 6-2 8-6 Jo Durie #74 Match data
Jan 6, 1986 Washington WTA 250 R32 Carpet Jo Durie #26 6-7 6-2 7-6 Lori Mcneil #95 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11