H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jo Durie vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 1-3
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 3–1 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 3–1 on carpet. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1988 Zurich fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 65
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1988* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-2 6-4 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1986 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 7-5 6-1 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1985* | Brighton | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-3 7-6 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1983* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jo Durie | 6-3 7-5 | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | #302 | #5 | 31 | 2,099 | 314 | 264 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo Durie | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,842 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |
| 28 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,717 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,693 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,562 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,554 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,547 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |