Jo Durie
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | 3 | 10 | 13 | Aug 14, 1992 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 8 | 5 | 13 | Jul 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 12 | 12 | Feb 2, 1991 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 2 | 9 | 11 | Aug 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Anne Hobbs | 4 | 5 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jo Durie vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 0-1
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik holds a 1–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik won the 1991 Canadian Open round of 64 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Jo Durie | Match data | Aug 7, 1991* | R64 | Canadian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | #302 | #5 | 31 | 2,101 | 311 | 263 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,625 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jo Durie | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #6 | 2,094 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,890 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,702 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,673 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,688 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,555 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,548 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Jo Durie | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1975 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1988 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1977 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1978 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1990 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1979 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1980 | — | — | — | — | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1983 | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1995 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1984 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1985 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1997 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1986 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 73 | 75 | 148 | 49.3% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 103 | 72 | 175 | 58.9% | 50 | 65 | 115 | 43.5% | Career | 19 | 28 | 47 | 40.4% | 14 | 30 | 44 | 31.8% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Jo Durie | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1975 | 1499 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.55 | 1987 | 1504 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +1.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.37 |
| 1976 | 1503 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | +73 | — | +94 | 54.2% | +0.71 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +3.14 | 1988 | 1578 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -8 | — | 45.5% | -0.15 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.9 | +0.45 |
| 1977 | 1602 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -35 | +40 | 56.1% | +0.71 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | +2.47 | 1989 | 1612 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -33 | — | 44.3% | -0.85 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 1978 | 1619 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | -9 | 57.4% | +0.50 | 5–1 (83%) | 1–2 (33%) | 104.3 | +2.99 | 1990 | 1589 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -55 | — | 32.7% | -1.00 | 5–3 (63%) | 0–5 (0%) | 99.0 | -0.92 |
| 1979 | 1714 | 129.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -76 | -94 | 58.5% | +0.36 | 6–1 (86%) | 6–2 (75%) | 110.0 | +0.87 | 1991 | 1554 | 113.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -34 | +68 | 35.7% | -0.98 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.8 | -0.11 |
| 1980 | 1734 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | -184 | -10 | -56 | 61.7% | +0.60 | 5–8 (38%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.6 | +0.68 | 1992 | 1520 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.57 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.32 |
| 1981 | 1859 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | -159 | -77 | -116 | 60.8% | +0.60 | 12–2 (86%) | 4–1 (80%) | 113.5 | -0.98 | 1993 | 1560 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.82 |
| 1982 | 1841 | 141.1 | — | — | — | — | -59 | -75 | -37 | 55.1% | +0.21 | 8–9 (47%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.4 | -2.62 | 1994 | 1546 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.30 |
| 1983 | 2095 | 159.8 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -184 | -99 | 69.3% | +1.31 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–2 (60%) | 104.6 | -5.64 | 1995 | 1545 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -11 | +27 | 40.8% | -0.86 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–1 | — | -0.97 |
| 1984 | 1891 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -59 | +84 | 49.3% | +0.53 | 7–4 (64%) | 1–5 (17%) | 95.2 | +0.18 | 1996 | 1527 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.60 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.67 |
| 1985 | 1800 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -48 | +123 | 48.8% | +0.06 | 7–7 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.7 | -1.37 | 1997 | 1515 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.13 |
| 1986 | 1842 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -79 | +45 | 55.7% | +0.21 | 11–6 (65%) | 8–3 (73%) | 105.1 | -3.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1741 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -30 | +108 | 41.0% | -0.69 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.3 | -2.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1703 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -16 | +119 | 49.4% | -0.10 | 6–5 (55%) | 8–4 (67%) | 101.9 | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1622 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -8 | — | +201 | 41.3% | -0.67 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.1 | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1674 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -60 | — | +193 | 51.7% | +0.48 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.4 | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1709 | 132.3 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -111 | +94 | 45.5% | -0.12 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.5 | +1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1689 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -48 | -50 | +162 | 50.0% | -0.09 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.1 | +0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1563 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | -11 | — | — | 35.9% | -0.74 | 3–6 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 92.1 | +1.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1555 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +191 | 33.3% | -1.42 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1548 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +141 | 40.0% | -0.60 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2101 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -67 | +43 | 53.6% | +0.27 | 97–90 (52%) | 53–46 (54%) | 102.6 | -0.68 | Career | 1625 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -29 | +45 | 38.2% | -0.87 | 23–24 (49%) | 6–16 (27%) | 97.8 | -1.28 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 2, 1995 | H2H |
| Silke Meier | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Emanuela Zardo | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 20, 1993 | H2H |
| Laurence Courtois | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 13, 1996 | H2H |