H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jo Durie vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-1

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1992 Brighton third round 3-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 23, 1992* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #6 3-2 (ret.) Jo Durie #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9 — — — — — — —