H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Michelle Jaggard Lai H2H: 3-0

Jo Durie holds a 3–0 lead over Michelle Jaggard Lai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jo Durie leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1990 ASB Classic round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie

GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H

3 – 0

3 main-draw meetings

Michelle Jaggard Lai

AUS Age 57 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Jo Durie #118	6-4 6-2	Michelle Jaggard Lai	Match data	Feb 2, 1990*	R16	ASB Classic	Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250	Hard
Jo Durie #24	6-3 3-6 6-4	Michelle Jaggard Lai	Match data	Jan 7, 1987*	R64	Sydney International	WTA 500	Grass
Jo Durie #27	7-5 6-4	Michelle Jaggard Lai	Match data	Nov 13, 1985*	R64	Brisbane International	WTA 500	Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Jo Durie	#302	#5	31	2,101	311	263	54.2%	0	0	0	1	8	9
Michelle Jaggard Lai	—	—	—	1,639	61	105	36.7%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Jo Durie							Michelle Jaggard Lai
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
14	1975	1–1	50.0%	—	1,498	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1976	5–6	45.5%	—	1,503	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1977	11–7	61.1%	—	1,602	0	0	1985	0–4	0.0%	—	1,459	0	0
17	1978	15–9	62.5%	—	1,619	0	1	1986	0–2	0.0%	—	1,442	0	0
18	1979	15–8	65.2%	—	1,713	0	3	1987	8–10	44.4%	—	1,510	0	0
19	1980	21–14	60.0%	—	1,733	0	4	1988	9–16	36.0%	—	1,515	0	0
20	1981	30–14	68.2%	—	1,859	0	7	1989	9–16	36.0%	—	1,499	0	0
21	1982	25–20	55.6%	—	1,841	0	7	1990	6–12	33.3%	—	1,505	0	0
22	1983	47–18	72.3%	#6	2,094	0	9	1991	3–6	33.3%	—	1,524	0	0
23	1984	16–15	51.6%	#24	1,890	0	9	1992	3–4	42.9%	—	1,555	0	0
24	1985	17–19	47.2%	#26	1,800	0	9	1993	14–19	42.4%	—	1,576	0	0
25	1986	24–17	58.5%	#24	1,841	0	9	1994	9–16	36.0%	—	1,559	0	0
26	1987	10–17	37.0%	#73	1,741	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1988	19–19	50.0%	#60	1,702	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1989	8–13	38.1%	#117	1,621	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1990	13–13	50.0%	#64	1,673	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1991	15–18	45.5%	#62	1,708	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1992	13–16	44.8%	#59	1,688	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1993	4–12	25.0%	#192	1,563	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1994	1–4	20.0%	#348	1,555	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1995	1–3	25.0%	#292	1,548	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Jo Durie																	Michelle Jaggard Lai
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
14	1975	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1976	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1977	—	—	—	—	5	4	9	55.6%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	1985	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—
17	1978	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	1986	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1979	—	—	—	—	6	2	8	75.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1987	7	4	11	63.6%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
19	1980	—	—	—	—	13	6	19	68.4%	8	4	12	66.7%	0	4	4	0.0%	1988	8	10	18	44.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	—	—	—	—
20	1981	4	2	6	66.7%	7	4	11	63.6%	6	5	11	54.5%	3	3	6	50.0%	1989	6	9	15	40.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
21	1982	4	3	7	57.1%	5	3	8	62.5%	10	6	16	62.5%	6	8	14	42.9%	1990	5	7	12	41.7%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
22	1983	12	3	15	80.0%	9	3	12	75.0%	16	4	20	80.0%	10	8	18	55.6%	1991	1	2	3	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
23	1984	2	4	6	33.3%	2	4	6	33.3%	8	4	12	66.7%	4	3	7	57.1%	1992	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—
24	1985	4	7	11	36.4%	1	3	4	25.0%	9	6	15	60.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	1993	13	12	25	52.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	3	3	0.0%
25	1986	10	6	16	62.5%	3	2	5	60.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	7	6	13	53.8%	1994	8	12	20	40.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
26	1987	3	5	8	37.5%	1	2	3	33.3%	5	5	10	50.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1988	9	9	18	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	7	5	12	58.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1989	6	9	15	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1990	6	6	12	50.0%	—	—	—	—	7	4	11	63.6%	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1991	7	9	16	43.8%	0	3	3	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1992	3	7	10	30.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	6	3	9	66.7%	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1993	2	4	6	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1994	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1995	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	73	75	148	49.3%	57	45	102	55.9%	103	72	175	58.9%	50	65	115	43.5%	—	49	60	109	45.0%	2	15	17	11.8%	9	21	30	30.0%	1	8	9	11.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Jo Durie																Michelle Jaggard Lai
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
14	1975	1499	100.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	+0.20	1–0	0–1	—	+0.55	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1976	1503	107.8	—	—	—	—	+73	—	+94	54.2%	+0.71	1–3 (25%)	1–0	—	+3.14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1977	1602	121.5	—	—	—	—	—	-35	+40	56.1%	+0.71	4–1 (80%)	0–1	—	+2.47	1985	1459	99.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	11.1%	-2.89	0–1	1–0	—	-0.14
17	1978	1619	121.0	—	—	—	—	+18	—	-9	57.4%	+0.50	5–1 (83%)	1–2 (33%)	104.3	+2.99	1986	1442	96.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-2.60	0–1	1–1	—	+0.04
18	1979	1714	129.5	—	—	—	—	—	-76	-94	58.5%	+0.36	6–1 (86%)	6–2 (75%)	110.0	+0.87	1987	1511	110.2	—	—	—	—	+92	—	+3	43.6%	-0.13	2–3 (40%)	1–4 (20%)	96.5	+1.25
19	1980	1734	122.7	—	—	—	—	-184	-10	-56	61.7%	+0.60	5–8 (38%)	4–1 (80%)	99.6	+0.68	1988	1515	101.4	—	—	—	—	+48	—	-67	36.4%	-0.91	3–2 (60%)	2–0	—	+1.65
20	1981	1859	136.3	—	—	—	—	-159	-77	-116	60.8%	+0.60	12–2 (86%)	4–1 (80%)	113.5	-0.98	1989	1499	106.6	—	—	—	—	+14	-24	-14	37.9%	-0.86	4–4 (50%)	1–0	—	+2.26
21	1982	1841	141.1	—	—	—	—	-59	-75	-37	55.1%	+0.21	8–9 (47%)	2–4 (33%)	97.4	-2.62	1990	1505	109.2	—	—	—	—	+20	-35	—	27.8%	-1.64	2–0	—	—	-0.23
22	1983	2095	159.8	—	—	—	—	-75	-184	-99	69.3%	+1.31	7–5 (58%)	3–2 (60%)	104.6	-5.64	1991	1525	117.5	—	—	—	—	-2	—	—	36.8%	-1.00	0–1	2–0	—	-0.56
23	1984	1891	136.3	—	—	—	—	+11	-59	+84	49.3%	+0.53	7–4 (64%)	1–5 (17%)	95.2	+0.18	1992	1555	114.2	—	—	—	—	-33	—	-14	37.5%	-1.06	2–0	—	—	-0.27
24	1985	1800	133.3	—	—	—	—	+15	-48	+123	48.8%	+0.06	7–7 (50%)	1–4 (20%)	96.7	-1.37	1993	1577	130.3	—	—	—	—	+19	—	-2	42.3%	-0.40	7–5 (58%)	6–4 (60%)	105.2	-0.76
25	1986	1842	140.0	—	—	—	—	+2	-79	+45	55.7%	+0.21	11–6 (65%)	8–3 (73%)	105.1	-3.56	1994	1559	117.1	—	—	—	—	+19	—	—	40.4%	-0.60	2–5 (29%)	3–2 (60%)	98.9	-0.39
26	1987	1741	134.1	—	—	—	—	+30	-30	+108	41.0%	-0.69	2–5 (29%)	2–2 (50%)	96.3	-2.72	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1988	1703	127.8	—	—	—	—	-1	-16	+119	49.4%	-0.10	6–5 (55%)	8–4 (67%)	101.9	-0.26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1989	1622	126.0	—	—	—	—	-8	—	+201	41.3%	-0.67	1–3 (25%)	3–2 (60%)	98.1	+0.38	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1990	1674	130.7	—	—	—	—	-60	—	+193	51.7%	+0.48	2–6 (25%)	3–5 (38%)	93.4	+0.04	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1991	1709	132.3	—	—	—	—	+4	-111	+94	45.5%	-0.12	6–7 (46%)	1–2 (33%)	100.5	+1.02	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1992	1689	130.7	—	—	—	—	-48	-50	+162	50.0%	-0.09	3–7 (30%)	4–1 (80%)	99.1	+0.39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1993	1563	107.8	—	—	—	—	-11	—	—	35.9%	-0.74	3–6 (33%)	0–4 (0%)	92.1	+1.33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1994	1555	106.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	+191	33.3%	-1.42	0–2	—	—	-0.60	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1995	1548	107.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	+141	40.0%	-0.60	0–2	1–0	—	-0.20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2101	141.6	—	—	—	—	-26	-67	+43	53.6%	+0.27	97–90 (52%)	53–46 (54%)	102.6	-0.68	—	1639	117.7	—	—	—	—	+28	-30	-22	37.6%	-0.82	22–22 (50%)	17–11 (61%)	107.4	+1.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Jo Durie's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Helena Sukova	3	10	13	Aug 14, 1992	H2H
Rosalyn Fairbank	8	5	13	Jul 21, 1990	H2H
Martina Navratilova	0	12	12	Feb 2, 1991	H2H
Pam Shriver	2	9	11	Aug 1, 1991	H2H
Anne Hobbs	4	5	9	May 28, 1986	H2H

Michelle Jaggard Lai's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Sabine Appelmans	2	2	4	Apr 14, 1994	H2H
Lori Mcneil	0	3	3	Oct 13, 1994	H2H
Pam Shriver	0	3	3	Jun 10, 1993	H2H
Bettina Fulco	1	2	3	Mar 13, 1993	H2H
Manon Bollegraf	3	0	3	Jan 15, 1992	H2H