H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jo Durie vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 2-0

Jo Durie holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1989 Australian Open second round 7-6(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 1989* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jo Durie #63 7-6(6) 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #79 Match data
Jun 27, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jo Durie #21 6-3 7-5 Nathalie Herreman #105 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9 — — — — — — —