H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jo Durie vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 1-1

Jo Durie and Nicole Bradtke are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on clay, while Jo Durie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1992 Los Angeles third round 6-2 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 1992* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Jo Durie #34 6-2 4-6 6-2 Nicole Bradtke #37 Match data
May 15, 1987* Berlin WTA 500 R16 Clay Nicole Bradtke #121 6-1 4-6 6-4 Jo Durie #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0
22 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9 — — — — — — —