H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jo Durie vs Patty Fendick H2H: 0-4
Patty Fendick holds a 4–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1995 Eastbourne second round 3-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 65
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1995* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Patty Fendick | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1994* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Patty Fendick | 6-2 6-1 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1991* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1988* | Aptos | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Patty Fendick | 7-5 0-6 7-6 | Jo Durie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | #302 | #5 | 31 | 2,099 | 314 | 264 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jo Durie | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1978 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,842 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,717 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,693 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,562 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,554 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,547 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |