H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 1-1

Jo Durie and Regina Marsikova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Regina Marsikova leads 1–0 on clay, while Jo Durie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1986 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 1-6 8-6.

GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo Durie #21 6-3 1-6 8-6 Regina Marsikova Match data Jun 25, 1986* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Regina Marsikova 6-0 6-4 Jo Durie Match data May 22, 1981* R16 Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jo Durie — #5 31 2,102 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Regina Marsikova — — — 2,036 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Regina Marsikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0 1975 5–5 50.0% — 1,581 0 0
17 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,618 0 1 1976 17–15 53.1% — 1,748 0 1
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1977 37–17 68.5% — 1,907 0 8
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,736 0 4 1978 56–30 65.1% — 1,953 0 12
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1979 38–24 61.3% — 1,938 0 12
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,842 0 7 1980 33–22 60.0% — 1,902 0 14
22 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,095 0 9 1981 34–16 68.0% — 1,998 0 15
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,891 0 9 — — — — — — —
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9 — — — — — — —
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 — — — — — — —
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,742 0 9 1985 12–16 42.9% — 1,764 0 15
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,703 0 9 1986 15–19 44.1% — 1,720 0 15
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1987 14–19 42.4% — 1,672 0 15
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,605 0 15
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9 1989 1–6 14.3% — 1,541 0 15
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jo Durie Regina Marsikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1976 — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
18 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3%
20 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
22 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5% — 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jo Durie Regina Marsikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +95 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.20 1974 1500 116.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.30
16 1977 1602 121.7 — — — — — -35 +42 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.17 1975 1582 125.6 — — — — +75 +3 — 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — 0.00
17 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +14 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +3.05 1976 1748 142.5 — — — — -178 +62 -175 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.71
18 1979 1713 129.5 — — — — — -74 -93 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.65 1977 1908 143.3 — — — — -346 +115 -246 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.7 +0.40
19 1980 1736 123.2 — — — — -179 -11 -58 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.27 1978 1953 158.0 — — — — -97 +117 -135 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.6 -6.67
20 1981 1861 136.4 — — — — -158 -78 -117 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -1.05 1979 1938 147.7 — — — — -80 +153 -92 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.57
21 1982 1843 141.3 — — — — -59 -76 -39 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -1.90 1980 1902 147.9 — — — — -21 +194 — 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.24
22 1983 2096 160.0 — — — — -76 -185 -100 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.50 1981 1999 159.4 — — — — -116 +183 — 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -5.46
23 1984 1892 136.4 — — — — +10 -61 +83 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 1801 133.4 — — — — +15 -49 +121 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 1843 140.1 — — — — +2 -80 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -2.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 1742 134.3 — — — — +30 -31 +107 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.4 -2.49 1985 1765 131.6 — — — — +5 +293 -79 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.24
27 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — 0 -16 +121 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.25 1986 1720 127.0 — — — — +3 +191 — 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.14
28 1989 1622 126.1 — — — — -7 — +202 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.33 1987 1673 129.0 — — — — +35 +91 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.64
29 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04 1988 1606 99.5 — — — — — +86 — 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.61
30 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +5 -111 +95 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02 1989 1541 97.0 — — — — — +71 — 14.3% -2.21 — 0–1 — +0.26
31 1992 1689 130.8 — — — — -48 -50 +163 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1564 107.8 — — — — -12 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1549 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2102 141.8 — — — — -26 -68 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.49 — 2036 150.6 — — — — -67 +139 -142 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.