H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jo Durie vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-1

Jo Durie and Sandra Cecchini are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1993 Key Biscayne second round 6-3 6-7 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 1993* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Jo Durie #52 6-3 6-7 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #34 Match data
Mar 15, 1989* Boca Raton WTA 250 R64 Hard Sandra Cecchini #22 3-6 7-6 6-2 Jo Durie #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9 — — — — — — —