H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Sophie Amiach H2H: 1-0

Jo Durie holds a 1–0 lead over Sophie Amiach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1981 Bournemouth 2 final 7-5 1-6 6-3.

GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 62 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo Durie 7-5 1-6 6-3 Sophie Amiach Match data Apr 27, 1981* F Bournemouth 2 WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jo Durie — #5 31 2,102 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Sophie Amiach — #57 9 1,647 57 93 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Sophie Amiach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0 1980 10–5 66.7% — 1,554 0 0
17 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,618 0 1 1981 6–6 50.0% — 1,610 0 0
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1982 8–8 50.0% — 1,585 0 0
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,736 0 4 1983 3–6 33.3% — 1,598 0 0
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1984 12–15 44.4% #76 1,627 0 0
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,842 0 7 1985 5–15 25.0% #121 1,532 0 0
22 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,095 0 9 1986 1–4 20.0% — 1,515 0 0
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,891 0 9 — — — — — — —
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9 1988 0–1 0.0% #213 1,512 0 0
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 1989 7–13 35.0% #129 1,555 0 0
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,742 0 9 1990 2–6 25.0% #227 1,529 0 0
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,703 0 9 1991 1–2 33.3% #243 1,518 0 0
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1992 0–2 0.0% #241 1,501 0 0
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9 1993 2–7 22.2% #199 1,477 0 0
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9 1994 0–1 0.0% #233 1,471 0 0
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9 1995 0–2 0.0% #446 1,459 0 0
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jo Durie Sophie Amiach
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1980 — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
17 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1981 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
19 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5% — 13 26 39 33.3% 27 32 59 45.8% 16 22 38 42.1% 1 11 12 8.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jo Durie Sophie Amiach
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +95 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 1602 121.7 — — — — — -35 +42 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.17 1980 1555 115.8 — — — — — +54 +7 73.1% +1.85 1–1 — — +2.50
17 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +14 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +3.05 1981 1610 112.9 — — — — — +93 — 46.4% -0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.05
18 1979 1713 129.5 — — — — — -74 -93 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.65 1982 1585 105.9 — — — — — +69 — 50.0% -0.31 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +1.38
19 1980 1736 123.2 — — — — -179 -11 -58 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.27 1983 1598 109.9 — — — — — — +20 33.3% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.13
20 1981 1861 136.4 — — — — -158 -78 -117 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -1.05 1984 1628 116.1 — — — — -65 -4 +40 44.6% -0.48 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.9 +2.39
21 1982 1843 141.3 — — — — -59 -76 -39 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -1.90 1985 1532 102.6 — — — — -35 — +92 33.3% -1.58 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.1 +1.94
22 1983 2096 160.0 — — — — -76 -185 -100 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.50 1986 1515 102.2 — — — — -15 — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 2–0 — -0.01
23 1984 1892 136.4 — — — — +10 -61 +83 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 1801 133.4 — — — — +15 -49 +121 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.39 1988 1513 105.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.11
25 1986 1843 140.1 — — — — +2 -80 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -2.77 1989 1556 119.2 — — — — -85 +17 +74 35.4% -1.08 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 104.3 -0.64
26 1987 1742 134.3 — — — — +30 -31 +107 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.4 -2.49 1990 1530 102.2 — — — — — +28 +77 22.2% -2.67 2–0 1–1 — -0.10
27 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — 0 -16 +121 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.25 1991 1518 104.5 — — — — -42 — — 33.3% -0.50 — — — +0.40
28 1989 1622 126.1 — — — — -7 — +202 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.33 1992 1501 105.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — -0.09
29 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04 1993 1477 104.3 — — — — -4 — — 30.0% -1.30 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.23
30 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +5 -111 +95 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02 1994 1472 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.02
31 1992 1689 130.8 — — — — -48 -50 +163 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39 1995 1460 106.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 1–0 — -0.14
32 1993 1564 107.8 — — — — -12 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1549 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2102 141.8 — — — — -26 -68 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.49 — 1648 115.9 — — — — -47 +49 +50 40.4% -0.80 20–24 (45%) 16–12 (57%) 102.7 +4.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.