H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jo Durie vs Tracy Austin H2H: 1-3

Tracy Austin holds a 3–1 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jo Durie leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1983 Roland Garros quarterfinal 6-1 4-6 6-0.

GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 2, 1983* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Jo Durie 6-1 4-6 6-0 Tracy Austin Match data
Mar 17, 1983* Boston WTA 250 R32 Carpet Tracy Austin 7-5 6-3 Jo Durie Match data
Sep 6, 1982* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tracy Austin 6-4 6-3 Jo Durie Match data
Jun 19, 1981* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Tracy Austin 6-1 6-4 Jo Durie Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Tracy Austin #81 #4 19 2,484 339 88 79.4% 2 2 1 4 19 28

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% 1,498 0 0 1977 14–8 63.6% 1,777 0 1
15 1976 5–6 45.5% 1,503 0 0 1978 43–13 76.8% 2,055 0 2
16 1977 11–7 61.1% 1,601 0 0 1979 73–12 85.9% 2,412 1 9
17 1978 18–10 64.3% 1,618 0 1 1980 81–10 89.0% 2,383 1 19
18 1979 15–8 65.2% 1,713 0 3 1981 56–7 88.9% 2,406 2 27
19 1980 21–14 60.0% 1,734 0 4 1982 35–12 74.5% 2,224 2 28
20 1981 30–14 68.2% 1,860 0 7 1983 24–8 75.0% 2,162 2 28
21 1982 25–20 55.6% 1,841 0 7 1984 2–2 50.0% #27 2,115 2 28
22 1983 47–18 72.3% 2,093 0 9
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 1989 0–2 0.0% 2,057 2 28
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,955 2 28
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9 1994 5–8 38.5% #81 1,840 2 28
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9