H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jo Durie vs Vicki Nelson H2H: 2-1
Jo Durie holds a 2–1 lead over Vicki Nelson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Vicki Nelson leads 1–0 on clay, while Jo Durie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1987 Australian Open second round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 65
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1987* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jo Durie | 7-5 6-1 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| May 24, 1984* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Vicki Nelson | 6-3 6-3 | Jo Durie | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1982* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Jo Durie | 0-6 7-5 6-1 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | #302 | #5 | 31 | 2,099 | 314 | 264 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jo Durie | Vicki Nelson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,842 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,717 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,693 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,562 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,554 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,547 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |