H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Zina Garrison H2H: 3-5

Zina Garrison holds a 5–3 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on grass, while Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1993 Key Biscayne round of 32 6-1 3-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main-draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #18 6-1 3-6 6-0 Jo Durie #52 Match data Mar 15, 1993* R32 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Zina Garrison #16 3-6 6-3 6-4 Jo Durie #54 Match data Oct 9, 1992* R16 Zurich Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Zina Garrison #14 5-7 6-1 6-1 Jo Durie #51 Match data Oct 1, 1992* R32 Leipzig Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Jo Durie #36 6-3 7-5 Zina Garrison #13 Match data Jun 17, 1992* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Jo Durie #160 6-3 6-7 7-5 Zina Garrison #11 Match data Aug 15, 1991* R32 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Zina Garrison #12 6-4 7-6 Jo Durie #74 Match data Jun 16, 1988* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Zina Garrison #8 6-0 6-0 Jo Durie #55 Match data Jun 20, 1985* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Jo Durie 6-4 6-2 Zina Garrison Match data Dec 3, 1982* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,101 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,619 0 1 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,733 0 4 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,990 0 1
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,859 0 7 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4
22 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,094 0 9 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,890 0 9 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,841 0 9 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,702 0 9 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,888 0 14
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jo Durie Zina Garrison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
21 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
22 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
23 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
26 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
27 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7%
28 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3%
29 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
30 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7%
32 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
33 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5% — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jo Durie Zina Garrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +94 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 1602 121.5 — — — — — -35 +40 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.47 1980 1529 117.3 — — — — +48 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.25
17 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +18 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +2.99 1981 1570 122.3 — — — — +74 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.08
18 1979 1714 129.5 — — — — — -76 -94 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.87 1982 1854 155.0 — — — — -185 -170 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -5.41
19 1980 1734 122.7 — — — — -184 -10 -56 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.68 1983 1991 154.6 — — — — -125 -109 -50 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.31
20 1981 1859 136.3 — — — — -159 -77 -116 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -0.98 1984 2013 157.3 — — — — +15 -96 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 +0.09
21 1982 1841 141.1 — — — — -59 -75 -37 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -2.62 1985 2033 160.2 — — — — +49 -57 -42 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +1.14
22 1983 2095 159.8 — — — — -75 -184 -99 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.64 1986 2001 159.2 — — — — +95 -126 -21 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.84
23 1984 1891 136.3 — — — — +11 -59 +84 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.18 1987 1988 166.8 — — — — +36 -60 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.77
24 1985 1800 133.3 — — — — +15 -48 +123 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.37 1988 2043 162.0 — — — — +19 -89 +75 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.39
25 1986 1842 140.0 — — — — +2 -79 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -3.56 1989 2135 170.0 — — — — +59 -212 -20 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.28
26 1987 1741 134.1 — — — — +30 -30 +108 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -2.72 1990 2041 161.7 — — — — +14 -144 +213 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68
27 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — -1 -16 +119 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.26 1991 1964 153.9 — — — — +30 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03
28 1989 1622 126.0 — — — — -8 — +201 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.38 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +39 -53 +312 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17
29 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +22 -217 +199 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.22
30 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +4 -111 +94 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02 1994 1889 145.3 — — — — +24 -186 +259 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25
31 1992 1689 130.7 — — — — -48 -50 +162 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39 1995 1868 147.9 — — — — +29 -240 +311 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45
32 1993 1563 107.8 — — — — -11 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33 1996 1712 111.8 — — — — +23 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20
33 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1548 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2101 141.6 — — — — -26 -67 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.68 — 2146 164.6 — — — — +27 -112 +91 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.