H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Jo Durie vs Zina Garrison H2H: 3-5

Zina Garrison holds a 5–3 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on grass, while Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1993 Key Biscayne third round 6-1 3-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 1993* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Zina Garrison #18 6-1 3-6 6-0 Jo Durie #52 Match data
Oct 9, 1992* Zurich WTA 250 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #16 3-6 6-3 6-4 Jo Durie #54 Match data
Oct 1, 1992* Leipzig WTA 250 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #14 5-7 6-1 6-1 Jo Durie #51 Match data
Jun 17, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Jo Durie #36 6-3 7-5 Zina Garrison #13 Match data
Aug 15, 1991* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Jo Durie #160 6-3 6-7 7-5 Zina Garrison #11 Match data
Jun 16, 1988* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Zina Garrison #12 6-4 7-6 Jo Durie #74 Match data
Jun 20, 1985* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Zina Garrison #8 6-0 6-0 Jo Durie #55 Match data
Dec 3, 1982* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Grass Jo Durie 6-4 6-2 Zina Garrison Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9 — — — — — — —