H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Joanne Limmer vs Angela Kerek H2H: 0-1

Angela Kerek holds a 1–0 lead over Joanne Limmer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angela Kerek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angela Kerek won the 1993 ASB Classic round of 32 6-7 7-5 6-3.

AUS Age 52 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Angela Kerek 6-7 7-5 6-3 Joanne Limmer #169 Match data Feb 4, 1993* R32 ASB Classic Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Joanne Limmer #744 #141 25 1,520 3 8 27.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Angela Kerek 1,523 5 13 27.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Joanne Limmer Angela Kerek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 1–2 33.3% #162 1,495 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% 1,496 0 0
19 1993 1–4 20.0% #211 1,465 0 0 1991 2–4 33.3% 1,484 0 0
20 1994 1–2 33.3% #288 1,470 0 0 1992 1–3 25.0% 1,493 0 0
21 1993 2–2 50.0% 1,499 0 0
22 1994 0–2 0.0% 1,469 0 0
23 1995 0–1 0.0% 1,456 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Joanne Limmer Angela Kerek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1495 100.2 +31 42.9% 0.00 0–1 +0.41 1990 1497 107.3 0.0% -1.50 0–1 -0.28
19 1993 1466 100.0 +24 25.0% -1.83 1–1 2–0 +0.20 1991 1484 98.5 +20 33.3% -1.08 0–1 +0.53
20 1994 1470 106.0 +26 33.3% -1.00 0–1 -0.07 1992 1493 107.7 22.2% -2.89 1–0 1–0 -0.29
21 1993 1500 94.2 +51 40.0% -0.60 2–0 0–1 +0.50
22 1994 1470 97.2 33.3% -0.67 0–2 +0.23
23 1995 1456 96.7 33.3% -3.00 0–1 +0.07
Career 1521 102.6 +26 32.0% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 100.2 +4.91 1524 100.3 +51 +20 31.0% -1.45 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 96.9 +4.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.