H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Joanne Russell vs Grace Kim H2H: 1-1

Joanne Russell and Grace Kim are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Grace Kim won the 1986 Indianapolis round of 64 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Joanne Russell
USA Age 71
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Grace Kim
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grace Kim 6-4 7-5 Joanne Russell Match data Apr 29, 1986* R64 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Joanne Russell 6-1 6-0 Grace Kim Match data May 30, 1984* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Joanne Russell — — — 1,936 203 199 50.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Joanne Russell Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,585 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,591 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1
18 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,544 0 0 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1
19 1974 5–2 71.4% — 1,579 0 1 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1
20 1975 17–12 58.6% — 1,691 0 2 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1
21 1976 16–14 53.3% — 1,817 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1977 19–16 54.3% — 1,880 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1978 13–16 44.8% — 1,859 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1979 6–10 37.5% — 1,777 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1980 30–22 57.7% — 1,874 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1981 27–23 54.0% — 1,807 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1982 20–22 47.6% — 1,825 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1983 11–11 50.0% — 1,799 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1984 27–17 61.4% — 1,838 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1985 7–20 25.9% — 1,613 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1986 2–10 16.7% — 1,534 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,514 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Joanne Russell Grace Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
19 1974 — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1976 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 6 4 10 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 14 4 18 77.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 43 88 51.1% 50 48 98 51.0% 22 25 47 46.8% 68 75 143 47.6% — 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Joanne Russell Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1592 115.9 — — — — +65 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1622 113.8 — — — — +26 — +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1694 125.2 — — — — +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64
18 1973 1544 116.2 — — — — — — — 58.3% +0.92 1–1 0–1 — -0.40 1986 1605 117.7 — — — — +47 -126 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32
19 1974 1580 104.9 — — — — — +12 — 62.5% +0.50 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.32 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +45 — -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.17
20 1975 1691 132.4 — — — — -81 -39 — 58.0% +0.36 5–6 (45%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.38 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26
21 1976 1817 140.3 — — — — -129 -143 -154 49.2% +0.11 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.2 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 1880 149.5 — — — — -95 -101 -215 53.8% +0.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.8 -3.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 1859 147.6 — — — — -125 -32 -151 46.4% -0.07 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 -3.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 1777 131.2 — — — — -82 +73 -117 41.9% -0.71 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.9 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 1874 145.9 — — — — -53 -41 -188 50.0% +0.13 16–2 (89%) 4–4 (50%) 113.8 -4.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 1808 138.5 — — — — +27 +22 -108 51.3% -0.02 13–8 (62%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -2.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 1825 141.7 — — — — +47 -82 -41 44.9% -0.29 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.5 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1799 134.2 — — — — +55 -16 — 49.0% -0.25 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 101.8 -2.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1839 128.3 — — — — +82 -129 -110 57.8% +0.28 9–5 (64%) 9–3 (75%) 105.8 +2.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1614 112.0 — — — — +49 +13 +71 26.3% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 0–6 (0%) 95.4 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1535 105.7 — — — — +62 +35 — 30.0% -1.47 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 95.4 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1515 97.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1937 143.7 — — — — -13 -35 -119 48.7% -0.06 79–52 (60%) 45–42 (52%) 108.6 -5.03 — 1705 119.1 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.