H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Joanne Russell vs Kate Gompert H2H: 0-2
Kate Gompert holds a 2–0 lead over Joanne Russell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1985 New Orleans third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1985* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kate Gompert | 6-4 7-5 | Joanne Russell | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kate Gompert | 6-3 6-2 | Joanne Russell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joanne Russell | — | — | — | 1,935 | 203 | 199 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,870 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joanne Russell | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1974 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1975 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1976 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1977 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 20–22 | 47.6% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1983 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |