H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Joannette Kruger vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 2-1
Joannette Kruger holds a 2–1 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Joannette Kruger leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1998 New Haven third round 6-4 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 52
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1998* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-4 3-6 7-6 | Joannette Kruger | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1997* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Joannette Kruger | 4-6 7-6 6-1 | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1995* | San Juan | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Joannette Kruger | 6-3 6-3 | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joannette Kruger | #972 | #21 | 1,280 | 1,879 | 147 | 162 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joannette Kruger | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #79 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,791 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #129 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #59 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #46 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #455 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #853 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |