H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Joannette Kruger vs Angelica Gavaldon H2H: 1-2
Angelica Gavaldon holds a 2–1 lead over Joannette Kruger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Angelica Gavaldon leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Joannette Kruger won the 1998 Australian Open first round 6-0 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 52
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1998* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Joannette Kruger | 6-0 2-0 (ret.) | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-3 6-1 | Joannette Kruger | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1993* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-0 6-2 | Joannette Kruger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joannette Kruger | #972 | #21 | 1,280 | 1,879 | 147 | 162 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joannette Kruger | Angelica Gavaldon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #79 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,791 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #129 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #59 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #46 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #455 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #853 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |