H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Joannette Kruger vs Jolene Watanabe H2H: 1-1
Joannette Kruger and Jolene Watanabe are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joannette Kruger leads 1–0 on grass, while Jolene Watanabe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jolene Watanabe won the 1996 Indian Wells second round 5-7 5-5 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 52
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1996* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jolene Watanabe | 5-7 5-5 (ret.) | Joannette Kruger | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1994* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Joannette Kruger | 6-4 6-4 | Jolene Watanabe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joannette Kruger | #972 | #21 | 1,280 | 1,879 | 147 | 162 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jolene Watanabe | #1,101 | #72 | 312 | 1,619 | 45 | 80 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joannette Kruger | Jolene Watanabe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #79 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,791 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #129 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #59 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #132 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #46 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #73 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #455 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #103 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #853 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |