H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Joannette Kruger vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 0-1
Laurence Courtois holds a 1–0 lead over Joannette Kruger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1996 Australian Open second round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 52
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Laurence Courtois | 6-3 7-6(5) | Joannette Kruger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joannette Kruger | #972 | #21 | 1,280 | 1,879 | 147 | 162 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joannette Kruger | Laurence Courtois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #79 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,791 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #129 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #59 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #46 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #455 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #853 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |