H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Joannette Kruger vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-2

Lori Mcneil holds a 2–1 lead over Joannette Kruger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 2–0 on grass, while Joannette Kruger leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joannette Kruger won the 1995 Zurich third round 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Joannette Kruger
RSA Age 52 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 1995* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Joannette Kruger #33 4-6 6-4 6-4 Lori Mcneil #45 Match data
Jun 16, 1994* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Lori Mcneil #20 6-1 6-3 Joannette Kruger #59 Match data
Jun 11, 1994* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Lori Mcneil #20 6-3 6-4 Joannette Kruger #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Joannette Kruger #972 #21 1,280 1,879 147 162 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Joannette Kruger Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1992 2–3 40.0% #96 1,508 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1993 9–13 40.9% #128 1,575 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1994 13–17 43.3% #79 1,638 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1995 19–15 55.9% #30 1,725 0 1 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1996 7–12 36.8% #126 1,646 0 1 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1997 25–18 58.1% #27 1,791 0 2 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1998 25–22 53.2% #30 1,721 0 2 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1999 9–13 40.9% #129 1,650 0 2 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2000 16–17 48.5% #59 1,659 0 2 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 2001 21–23 47.7% #46 1,643 0 2 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2002 1–4 20.0% #455 1,591 0 2 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2003 0–5 0.0% #853 1,531 0 2 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11