H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Joannette Kruger vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 1-1

Joannette Kruger and Sandra Cacic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on clay, while Joannette Kruger leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 2001 Amelia Island round of 64 6-3 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Joannette Kruger
RSA Age 53 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cacic
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cacic #92 6-3 5-7 6-3 Joannette Kruger #50 Match data Apr 11, 2001* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Joannette Kruger #29 6-3 6-2 Sandra Cacic #63 Match data Feb 24, 1996* R16 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Joannette Kruger #972 #21 1,280 1,860 147 163 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sandra Cacic #409 #39 548 1,730 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Joannette Kruger Sandra Cacic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #310 1,481 0 0
18 1992 2–3 40.0% #96 1,508 0 0 1993 4–6 40.0% #76 1,533 0 0
19 1993 9–13 40.9% #128 1,576 0 0 1994 12–16 42.9% #54 1,617 0 0
20 1994 13–17 43.3% #79 1,639 0 0 1995 7–12 36.8% #114 1,602 0 0
21 1995 19–15 55.9% #30 1,726 0 1 1996 9–12 42.9% #78 1,569 0 1
22 1996 7–13 35.0% #126 1,625 0 1 1997 7–11 38.9% #60 1,581 0 1
23 1997 25–18 58.1% #27 1,785 0 2 1998 7–16 30.4% #82 1,556 0 1
24 1998 25–22 53.2% #30 1,713 0 2 1999 2–7 22.2% #188 1,509 0 1
25 1999 9–13 40.9% #129 1,646 0 2 2000 0–1 0.0% #140 1,505 0 1
26 2000 16–17 48.5% #59 1,657 0 2 2001 9–11 45.0% #117 1,577 0 1
27 2001 21–23 47.7% #46 1,643 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% #322 1,565 0 1
28 2002 1–4 20.0% #455 1,591 0 2 2003 1–2 33.3% #395 1,548 0 1
29 2003 0–5 0.0% #853 1,531 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Joannette Kruger Sandra Cacic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1992 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1997 4 3 7 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 18 11 29 62.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 7 7 14 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2001 16 12 28 57.1% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 62 64 126 49.2% 7 14 21 33.3% 8 18 26 30.8% — 38 48 86 44.2% 10 31 41 24.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Joannette Kruger Sandra Cacic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1482 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22
18 1992 1508 108.6 — — — — — +78 — 41.7% -1.00 1–1 1–1 — 0.00 1993 1534 121.2 — — — — +55 — — 36.0% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02
19 1993 1576 111.5 — — — — -64 +57 +8 38.5% -0.98 6–2 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 103.1 -0.32 1994 1617 134.8 — — — — +7 -51 — 43.9% -0.56 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.15
20 1994 1640 139.3 — — — — -110 +86 -11 44.1% -0.47 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 -0.48 1995 1602 122.7 — — — — +22 -68 — 40.9% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03
21 1995 1726 133.4 — — — — -64 +26 — 54.5% +0.18 5–4 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 101.5 +0.79 1996 1569 120.7 — — — — +101 -123 — 43.5% -0.54 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.01
22 1996 1625 111.8 — — — — -5 +66 — 36.6% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 103.7 -0.38 1997 1582 124.7 — — — — +81 — +18 43.6% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 -0.41
23 1997 1786 143.0 — — — — -78 +29 — 53.0% +0.10 11–3 (79%) 6–4 (60%) 109.9 -0.97 1998 1556 129.8 — — — — +49 -109 — 35.2% -1.04 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -0.12
24 1998 1714 137.8 — — — — +52 +7 — 50.0% -0.24 9–5 (64%) 4–6 (40%) 101.8 +0.70 1999 1509 93.4 — — — — +60 -82 — 23.5% -2.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
25 1999 1647 113.5 — — — — +68 +11 — 39.6% -0.53 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.5 -0.09 2000 1505 103.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19
26 2000 1658 124.8 — — — — +24 -4 — 50.0% -0.01 6–8 (43%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.73 2001 1578 126.4 — — — — +38 -178 — 41.3% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.74
27 2001 1644 115.3 — — — — +38 -79 -127 44.1% -0.64 11–5 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 +0.58 2002 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02
28 2002 1591 105.0 — — — — +36 — — 30.8% -1.23 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.01 2003 1548 101.1 — — — — +35 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–2 — +0.14
29 2003 1532 103.1 -1.38 +1.09 0.673 38.9% — -5 — 16.7% -2.50 0–2 — — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1861 132.9 -1.38 +1.09 0.673 38.9% -3 +20 -33 46.1% -0.41 64–42 (60%) 39–40 (49%) 103.4 -0.42 — 1731 130.9 — — — — +50 -93 +18 39.1% -0.75 23–23 (50%) 14–17 (45%) 102.9 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.