H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jolene Watanabe vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 0-1
Kimberly Po Messerli holds a 1–0 lead over Jolene Watanabe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimberly Po Messerli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimberly Po Messerli won the 1997 Tokyo fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1997* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-2 6-2 | Jolene Watanabe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jolene Watanabe | #1,101 | #72 | 312 | 1,619 | 45 | 80 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jolene Watanabe | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #132 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #73 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #103 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |