H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jolene Watanabe vs Mariaan De Swardt H2H: 1-1
Jolene Watanabe and Mariaan De Swardt are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mariaan De Swardt leads 1–0 on grass, while Jolene Watanabe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mariaan De Swardt won the 1999 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mariaan De Swardt | 6-1 6-4 | Jolene Watanabe | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jolene Watanabe | 6-4 6-3 | Mariaan De Swardt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jolene Watanabe | #1,101 | #72 | 312 | 1,619 | 45 | 80 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariaan De Swardt | — | — | — | 1,784 | 65 | 81 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jolene Watanabe | Mariaan De Swardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #132 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #73 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #103 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |