H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Joy Cummings vs Cathleen Farrell H2H: 2-0

Joy Cummings holds a 2–0 lead over Cathleen Farrell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joy Cummings leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joy Cummings won the 1982 Flemington round of 32 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Joy Cummings
USA Age 63
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Cathleen Farrell
USA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joy Cummings 6-1 6-3 Cathleen Farrell Match data Jun 17, 1982* R32 Flemington WTA 250 Hard
Joy Cummings 6-0 6-1 Cathleen Farrell Match data May 14, 1980* R32 Delray Beach WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Joy Cummings — — — 1,516 10 15 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cathleen Farrell — — — 1,500 4 17 19.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Joy Cummings Cathleen Farrell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 2–4 33.3% — 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,462 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1982 7–7 50.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1985 1–3 25.0% — 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — 1980 1–6 14.3% — 1,441 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,381 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1982 3–6 33.3% — 1,385 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Joy Cummings Cathleen Farrell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1467 98.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.67 1–2 (33%) — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 1463 99.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 1490 105.1 — — — — +84 — — 50.0% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 1473 96.0 — — — — — +52 — 36.4% -1.36 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1441 89.8 — — — — +63 — — 23.1% -2.39 0–1 — — +0.14
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1381 91.0 — — — — — — — 9.1% -2.36 0–1 0–2 — +0.07
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1385 101.9 — — — — +83 +168 — 42.1% -0.21 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +1.22
Career — 1516 100.9 — — — — +84 +52 — 43.3% -0.52 4–6 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 +5.76 — 1500 93.2 — — — — +73 +168 — 27.9% -1.42 1–4 (20%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 +7.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.