H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Joyce Portman vs Patrizia Murgo H2H: 1-0

Joyce Portman holds a 1–0 lead over Patrizia Murgo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joyce Portman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Joyce Portman won the 1981 Perugia round of 16 6-2 6-2.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joyce Portman 6-2 6-2 Patrizia Murgo Match data May 8, 1981* R16 Perugia WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Joyce Portman — — — 1,650 17 30 36.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patrizia Murgo — — — 1,560 12 16 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Joyce Portman Patrizia Murgo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1981 9–8 52.9% — 1,534 0 0
20 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,508 0 0
21 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1980 6–9 40.0% — 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1981 10–17 37.0% — 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,534 0 0 1986 1–2 33.3% — 1,494 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Joyce Portman Patrizia Murgo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1979 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 3 7 10 30.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1982 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 4 12 16 25.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Joyce Portman Patrizia Murgo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1491 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1535 104.2 — — — — — +78 — 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–1 — +1.81
20 1978 1485 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08 1982 1509 86.9 — — — — +50 +37 — 30.8% -2.15 1–0 — — +0.29
21 1979 1504 114.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 1521 109.4 — — — — -36 +64 — 44.1% -0.91 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 1548 121.7 — — — — -64 +139 — 43.1% -0.41 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) 92.6 +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1982 1534 90.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.31 1986 1495 91.9 — — — — — +48 — 28.6% -2.28 1–0 — — +0.34
Career — 1650 115.9 — — — — -53 +125 — 41.2% -0.75 2–9 (18%) 1–4 (20%) 91.6 +0.47 — 1561 95.6 — — — — +50 +65 — 42.9% -0.85 4–0 (100%) 1–1 — +8.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.