H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Joyce Williams vs E Scott H2H: 1-0

Joyce Williams holds a 1–0 lead over E Scott in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joyce Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Joyce Williams won the 1972 Newport Wales round of 32 6-1 6-1.

H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joyce Williams 6-1 6-1 E Scott Match data Jul 13, 1972* R32 Newport Wales WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Joyce Williams 1,971 188 88 68.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10
E Scott 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Joyce Williams E Scott
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 35–20 63.6% 1,627 0 1 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0
1969 36–20 64.3% 1,790 0 2
1970 46–17 73.0% 1,860 0 5
1971 23–12 65.7% 1,916 0 6
1972 30–8 78.9% 1,939 0 8
1973 5–4 55.6% 1,866 0 8
1974 1–3 25.0% 1,847 0 8
1975 5–1 83.3% 1,863 0 10
1976 0–1 0.0% 1,841 0 10
1979 7–2 77.8% 1,824 0 10

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Joyce Williams E Scott
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 13 8 21 61.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
1969 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 16 10 26 61.5% 10 7 17 58.8%
1970 2 1 3 66.7% 19 4 23 82.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2%
1971 9 5 14 64.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
1972 2 1 3 66.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 13 3 16 81.3% 4 1 5 80.0%
1973 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
1974 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1975 1 1 2 50.0%
1976 0 1 1 0.0%
1979 4 1 5 80.0%
Career 7 4 11 63.6% 63 21 84 75.0% 68 38 106 64.2% 43 24 67 64.2% Career 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Joyce Williams E Scott
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1627 120.2 +50 -54 +16 60.5% +0.82 7–4 (64%) -0.49 1972 1497 100.3 0.0% -5.00 -0.25
1969 1791 139.2 -16 -45 -22 64.0% +1.31 3–5 (38%) -2.77
1970 1860 148.3 +2 +76 -31 70.6% +1.70 6–6 (50%) 0–1 -0.69
1971 1916 145.9 -2 +19 63.8% +1.09 5–5 (50%) 3–1 (75%) -3.52
1972 1940 143.0 -65 +57 +25 74.4% +1.87 6–4 (60%) 3–0 (100%) +0.35
1973 1866 117.7 +112 +57 59.1% +1.18 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.76
1974 1848 116.4 -33 25.0% -0.38 0–2 -0.62
1975 1864 125.8 76.9% +3.00 1–0 +0.14
1976 1841 99.3 33.3% -0.33 0–1 +0.01
1979 1825 119.8 +146 70.0% +1.70 2–0 2–1 (67%) +1.13
Career 1971 143.4 +2 +30 +3 65.9% +1.37 31–28 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 101.6 -2.10 Career 1500 100.1 0.0% -5.00 -25.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.