H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Joyce Williams vs Shirley Bloomer H2H: 5-0
Joyce Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Shirley Bloomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Joyce Williams leads 5–0 on clay. Most recently, Joyce Williams won the 1971 Sutton semifinal 6-2 3-6 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1971* | Sutton | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Joyce Williams | 6-2 3-6 9-7 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1970* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Joyce Williams | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1970* | Southport England | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Joyce Williams | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
| May 2, 1968* | Hurlingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Joyce Williams | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1968* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Joyce Williams | 6-2 6-3 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joyce Williams | — | — | — | 1,966 | 188 | 88 | 68.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Shirley Bloomer | — | — | — | 1,769 | 84 | 56 | 60.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Joyce Williams | Shirley Bloomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 35–20 | 63.6% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 18–7 | 72.0% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 1969 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 46–17 | 73.0% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 23–12 | 65.7% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 1972 | 30–8 | 78.9% | — | 1,935 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,835 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |