H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Judith Dibar vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 1-0

Judith Dibar holds a 1–0 lead over Florenta Mihai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judith Dibar leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Judith Dibar won the 1974 Nice Intl final 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Judith Dibar
ROU Age 81
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Florenta Mihai
ROU

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Judith Dibar 7-6 6-4 Florenta Mihai Match data Apr 21, 1974* F Nice Intl WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Judith Dibar — — — 1,625 29 34 46.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Florenta Mihai — — — 1,799 89 90 49.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Judith Dibar Florenta Mihai
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1974 3–2 60.0% — 1,515 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,508 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,634 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1977 16–13 55.2% — 1,774 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1978 7–20 25.9% — 1,642 0 1
23 1968 5–9 35.7% — 1,465 0 0 1979 7–9 43.8% — 1,615 0 1
24 1969 6–5 54.5% — 1,520 0 2 1980 7–9 43.8% — 1,578 0 1
25 1970 5–3 62.5% — 1,543 0 4 1981 30–13 69.8% — 1,652 0 3
26 1971 1–5 16.7% — 1,500 0 4 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,618 0 3
27 1972 1–0 100.0% — 1,516 0 5 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,624 0 3
28 1973 3–8 27.3% — 1,507 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1974 8–4 66.7% — 1,610 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Judith Dibar Florenta Mihai
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 1968 — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1979 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1969 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1970 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1971 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 1973 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1974 — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — — — — — 20 23 43 46.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — 3 10 13 23.1% 39 27 66 59.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 9 22 31 29.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Judith Dibar Florenta Mihai
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1516 105.0 — — — — — +18 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 0–1 — +1.34
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1509 103.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 — +1.56
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1634 124.5 — — — — -65 +1 -51 41.8% -0.45 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 107.6 +0.91
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1774 133.4 — — — — -215 +53 — 52.9% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 106.6 +0.88
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1643 119.2 — — — — -37 +89 -110 25.9% -1.90 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.0 -1.87
23 1968 1466 97.6 — — — — — +27 — 39.3% -0.75 1–1 — — +0.83 1979 1615 118.8 — — — — -69 — -31 43.3% -0.43 1–1 0–1 — +0.94
24 1969 1520 108.7 — — — — — -53 — 52.0% -0.24 2–1 (67%) — — +0.31 1980 1579 102.2 — — — — — +168 -47 47.5% -0.47 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.23
25 1970 1543 105.2 — — — — — -23 — 64.7% +0.94 0–1 — — +2.22 1981 1652 129.6 — — — — — +130 — 67.7% +1.51 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 99.8 +2.54
26 1971 1501 100.3 — — — — — -24 — 28.6% -1.57 0–2 — — +0.21 1982 1618 104.2 — — — — — +106 — 50.0% +0.38 0–2 — — +0.59
27 1972 1517 102.8 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.00 — — — +0.15 1983 1625 105.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 — — +0.05
28 1973 1507 106.8 — — — — — -50 -14 30.4% -1.35 0–1 0–1 — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1974 1610 122.6 — — — — — +23 — 60.7% +0.75 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1626 111.0 — — — — — -5 -14 47.4% -0.27 6–7 (46%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 +8.23 — 1800 126.9 — — — — -97 +66 -73 49.3% -0.08 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 101.3 +4.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.