H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Judith Dibar vs Lea Pericoli H2H: 0-1

Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Judith Dibar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1969 Cairo round of 16 6-1 6-1.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
ITA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Pericoli 6-1 6-1 Judith Dibar Match data Mar 10, 1969* R16 Cairo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Judith Dibar 1,625 29 34 46.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Lea Pericoli 1,772 58 51 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Judith Dibar Lea Pericoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 1968 5–9 35.7% 1,465 0 0
24 1969 6–5 54.5% 1,520 0 2
25 1970 5–3 62.5% 1,543 0 4
26 1971 1–5 16.7% 1,500 0 4
27 1972 1–0 100.0% 1,516 0 5
28 1973 3–8 27.3% 1,507 0 5
29 1974 8–4 66.7% 1,610 0 6
33 1968 8–5 61.5% 1,586 0 1
34 1969 15–7 68.2% 1,705 0 2
35 1970 11–7 61.1% 1,756 0 3
36 1971 9–8 52.9% 1,752 0 3
37 1972 3–6 33.3% 1,659 0 3
38 1973 4–3 57.1% 1,648 0 3
39 1974 6–6 50.0% 1,641 0 3
40 1975 2–7 22.2% 1,554 0 3
41 1976 0–2 0.0% 1,548 0 3

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Judith Dibar Lea Pericoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 1968 1466 97.6 +27 39.3% -0.75 1–1 +0.83
24 1969 1520 108.7 -53 52.0% -0.24 2–1 (67%) +0.31
25 1970 1543 105.2 -23 64.7% +0.94 0–1 +2.22
26 1971 1501 100.3 -24 28.6% -1.57 0–2 +0.21
27 1972 1517 102.8 100.0% +3.00 +0.15
28 1973 1507 106.8 -50 -14 30.4% -1.35 0–1 0–1 +0.45
29 1974 1610 122.6 +23 60.7% +0.75 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +0.93
33 1968 1586 120.0 +5 +12 70.8% +1.92 1–1 +0.13
34 1969 1705 134.1 +26 67.3% +1.55 2–3 (40%) -1.00
35 1970 1757 135.6 -3 -150 60.5% +1.24 3–1 (75%) -0.73
36 1971 1752 125.6 +1 50.0% +0.08 3–1 (75%) -0.10
37 1972 1659 111.6 +28 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.57
38 1973 1648 114.4 +17 80.0% +2.50 +1.43
39 1974 1642 116.2 +20 51.7% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.98
40 1975 1555 100.4 +15 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +1.40
41 1976 1548 102.8 0.0% -3.50 -0.12
Career 1626 111.0 -5 -14 47.4% -0.27 6–7 (46%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 +8.23 1773 132.2 +5 +14 -150 56.0% +0.67 12–14 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 +2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.