H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Judith Dibar vs Lea Pericoli H2H: 0-1
Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Judith Dibar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1969 Cairo fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1969* | Cairo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lea Pericoli | 6-1 6-1 | Judith Dibar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith Dibar | — | — | — | 1,625 | 29 | 34 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Lea Pericoli | — | — | — | 1,764 | 58 | 51 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Judith Dibar | Lea Pericoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 8–4 | 66.7% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 3 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 3 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 3 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 3 |