H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Judith Salome vs Helga Masthoff H2H: 0-1

Helga Masthoff holds a 1–0 lead over Judith Salome in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helga Masthoff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helga Masthoff won the 1971 Beaulieu quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
FRG Age 84 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helga Masthoff 6-1 6-3 Judith Salome Match data Mar 26, 1971* QF Beaulieu WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Judith Salome 1,579 27 38 41.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Helga Masthoff 2,113 391 115 77.3% 0 0 0 4 46 50

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Judith Salome Helga Masthoff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1968 3–5 37.5% 1,473 0 0
20 1969 10–20 33.3% 1,439 0 0
21 1970 8–7 53.3% 1,534 0 0
22 1971 4–4 50.0% 1,552 0 0
23 1972 1–1 50.0% 1,561 0 0
24 1973 1–1 50.0% 1,567 0 0
26 1968 29–13 69.0% 1,730 0 1
27 1969 45–13 77.6% 1,906 0 10
28 1970 53–12 81.5% 2,047 0 15
29 1971 42–9 82.4% 2,084 0 23
30 1972 29–12 70.7% 2,023 0 27
31 1973 40–13 75.5% 2,087 0 30
32 1974 27–10 73.0% 2,019 0 33
33 1975 25–8 75.8% 1,998 0 37
34 1976 34–8 81.0% 1,950 0 42
35 1977 18–4 81.8% 1,941 0 45
36 1978 13–5 72.2% 1,895 0 45
37 1979 10–1 90.9% 1,930 0 48
38 1980 26–7 78.8% 1,873 0 50

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Judith Salome Helga Masthoff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1968 1473 92.7 +32 36.8% -1.26 2–1 (67%) +0.59
20 1969 1439 93.1 +59 -9 +6 27.7% -1.42 7–2 (78%) +0.65
21 1970 1535 111.5 -29 +45 51.4% 0.00 4–3 (57%) +1.26
22 1971 1553 110.0 -102 56.3% +0.37 1–1 +1.18
23 1972 1562 103.6 40.0% 0.00 1–0 -0.01
24 1973 1568 104.9 50.0% +0.50 +0.17
26 1968 1730 128.1 -162 +89 66.7% +1.31 7–8 (47%) -1.04
27 1969 1907 137.1 -313 +115 74.0% +1.89 8–7 (53%) -0.20
28 1970 2047 159.4 -330 +75 -427 79.6% +2.22 6–5 (55%) -5.92
29 1971 2084 146.6 -311 +124 -455 72.0% +1.78 17–3 (85%) 2–2 (50%) 105.8 -1.82
30 1972 2024 152.0 -290 +162 69.4% +1.51 4–1 (80%) 3–0 (100%) -3.25
31 1973 2088 160.2 -369 +126 -344 72.2% +1.77 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 101.3 -2.46
32 1974 2019 153.9 +99 -212 67.5% +1.24 8–2 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 -3.17
33 1975 1999 142.8 +76 -105 71.6% +1.26 7–3 (70%) 6–3 (67%) 104.5 -0.41
34 1976 1951 146.9 +125 -61 76.1% +2.14 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 99.7 +1.10
35 1977 1941 128.5 -150 +143 -91 75.5% +1.73 4–1 (80%) 3–1 (75%) 103.1 +2.07
36 1978 1895 134.2 -97 +128 68.4% +1.55 2–2 (50%) 1–0 +1.22
37 1979 1930 131.0 +128 85.7% +2.86 1–0 1–1 +0.26
38 1980 1873 133.5 +139 73.1% +1.86 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +1.56
Career 1580 102.1 +25 -33 +31 39.0% -0.74 15–7 (68%) +6.19 2114 153.3 -250 +115 -205 72.9% +1.76 85–42 (67%) 25–18 (58%) 104.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.